Re: [dnssd] Some possible agenda items for Brisbane

Thanks Ted! As always, quite impressive progress on draft deadline day :-)

Based on what we've gathered so far, I think a potential agenda could be:

# WG documents

* draft-ietf-dnssd-multi-qtypes - Ray Bellis

* draft-ietf-dnssd-srp - Ted Lemon
    (quick summary of changes during IESG review)

* draft-ietf-dnssd-advertising-proxy - Ted Lemon

* draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-replication - Ted Lemon

# Individual Drafts

* draft-tllq-tsr - Ted Lemon

* draft-tlmd-push-dnssd-additional - Di Ma

My thinking was to order the documents from closest to furthest to
publication, with the exception of multi-qtypes because we've been asked to
put that first so some DNSOP enthusiasts can join for just that one.

Since the DNSSD session this time around is joint with SNAC, we'll
coordinate with the SNAC chairs to finalize the agenda, but if anyone has
thoughts or comments, please send them in reply to this email, we'd prefer
to bash the agenda sooner rather than later.

Thanks,
David

On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 5:31 PM Ted Lemon <elemon=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
wrote:

> SRP has been updated, I think we're done, there's one last nit we could
> talk about, which is, should we require single-hop protection. This was
> raised by the transport area review, IIRC, and has also been raised on the
> list. So we definitely have an excuse to do this as part of IESG review if
> we want.
>
> I just updated TSR to reflect what I talked about in Prague.
>
> I just updated advertising proxy to reflect what I talked about in Prague.
>
> Jonathan just updated replication.
>
> Di Ma and I talked in Prague about doing an extension to DNS Push, and it
> turned out we were thinking about different things, but anyway we have a
> draft that might be worth presenting, and is actual new work the WG hasn't
> seen before, with a co-author who isn't all FAANGy, so that's cool. The -00
> is published as draft-tlmd-push-dnssd-additional-00 (
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tlmd-push-dnssd-additional/).
>
> I think that's everything I know about. We definitely have a bunch of
> remaining work to do. I've mostly talked about the stuff that's in the
> document updates already, so it would mostly be status updates, but we
> haven't had a lot of discussion about some of the ideas I presented in
> Prague (e.g. subdomains of local as a way to avoid collisions).
>
> So, if there is energy to participate in these discussions, that would be
> great.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dnssd mailing list
> dnssd@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd
>