Re: [dnssd] Call for WG Adoption: draft-huitema-dnssd-privacy-01

Daniel Kaiser <daniel.kaiser@uni-konstanz.de> Tue, 26 July 2016 09:50 UTC

Return-Path: <daniel.kaiser@uni-konstanz.de>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC6F12D09C for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 02:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.486
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.486 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HVdsvyR-gEKl for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 02:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from purin.rz.uni-konstanz.de (purin.rz.uni-konstanz.de [134.34.240.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FEC512D0CF for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 02:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nkongsamba.rz.uni-konstanz.de (HELO smtp.uni-konstanz.de) ([134.34.240.62]) by viribus.rz.uni-konstanz.de with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Jul 2016 09:50:43 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.12] (unknown [5.158.128.23]) (Authenticated sender: daniel.kaiser) by smtp.uni-konstanz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9467725A for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:50:43 +0200 (CEST)
To: dnssd@ietf.org
References: <3D43CEAD-3D12-4E32-AA01-8A1E4ABD8D86@jisc.ac.uk> <CABkgnnVnB=ByS_jmguWR3aWsmtjP-WwJtEcPOTHRoEPuif4SDQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Kaiser <daniel.kaiser@uni-konstanz.de>
Message-ID: <95946360-5699-4a88-1d2c-18ef684a7a35@uni-konstanz.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:50:43 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVnB=ByS_jmguWR3aWsmtjP-WwJtEcPOTHRoEPuif4SDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------DA4B718128CC12F61F199DD6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/SKCGfFLVO4JiFCOuTY-FRUuU3b8>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] Call for WG Adoption: draft-huitema-dnssd-privacy-01
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:50:48 -0000

We started working on a new document on pairing.
A reference to this new pairing document will be substituted for
the pairing part in the privacy document.

Further, we will remove the part on the simple design from the
privacy document making it more concise.



On 07/26/2016 10:28 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> What is the status of the pairing piece of this work?  None of this
> can work without addressing that portion.  The document contains some
> ideas, but these are quite nebulous and certainly not sufficient to
> deploy an interoperable solution for this.
>
> (I'm generally supportive of this work, but I want to make sure that
> everyone understands the scope and magnitude of the work involved
> here.)
>
> On 25 July 2016 at 16:16, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> At the meeting in Berlin, there was a positive reaction to the "Privacy
>> Extensions for DNS-SD” draft,
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huitema-dnssd-privacy-01.
>>
>> While only a small number of people had read it in detail, those who had
>> read it expressed a desire for the WG to adopt the draft.
>>
>> This email therefore begins a two-week formal dnssd mail list call for
>> adoption of the draft by the WG. Please send any comments, for or against,
>> to the dnssd WG list. If you indicated support in the meeting, feel free to
>> reaffirm this, and add any comments.
>>
>> The call ends on Monday 8th August.
>>
>> The document status in the data tracker can be found at
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huitema-dnssd-privacy/.
>>
>> Note that the WG in which the specifics of the pairing protocol will be
>> developed will be reviewed by our AD. On the one had it is a generic
>> mechanism that may be better defined in a security WG, on the other we
>> should have a critical mass of people to get the work done here, if the
>> draft is adopted.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dnssd mailing list
>> dnssd@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dnssd mailing list
> dnssd@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd