Re: [dnssd] Call for WG Adoption: draft-huitema-dnssd-privacy-01

I support adoption , and I'd like to second Dave's point on the pairing. 

From my high tech gadget

> On Jul 26, 2016, at 10:41, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> Just reaffirmining what I said at the mic.
> 
> I support adopting this draft, while the pairing portion I would prefer be in a separate
> draft in a different group (e.g. intarea with joint review by saag), since the pairing part
> should not be specific to dnssd.
> 
> Dave
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dnssd [mailto:dnssd-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Thomson
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 1:29 AM
>> To: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
>> Cc: dnssd@ietf.org; Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
>> Subject: Re: [dnssd] Call for WG Adoption: draft-huitema-dnssd-privacy-01
>> 
>> What is the status of the pairing piece of this work?  None of this can work
>> without addressing that portion.  The document contains some ideas, but
>> these are quite nebulous and certainly not sufficient to deploy an
>> interoperable solution for this.
>> 
>> (I'm generally supportive of this work, but I want to make sure that everyone
>> understands the scope and magnitude of the work involved
>> here.)
>> 
>>> On 25 July 2016 at 16:16, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> At the meeting in Berlin, there was a positive reaction to the
>>> "Privacy Extensions for DNS-SD” draft,
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huitema-dnssd-privacy-01.
>>> 
>>> While only a small number of people had read it in detail, those who
>>> had read it expressed a desire for the WG to adopt the draft.
>>> 
>>> This email therefore begins a two-week formal dnssd mail list call for
>>> adoption of the draft by the WG. Please send any comments, for or
>>> against, to the dnssd WG list. If you indicated support in the
>>> meeting, feel free to reaffirm this, and add any comments.
>>> 
>>> The call ends on Monday 8th August.
>>> 
>>> The document status in the data tracker can be found at
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huitema-dnssd-privacy/.
>>> 
>>> Note that the WG in which the specifics of the pairing protocol will
>>> be developed will be reviewed by our AD. On the one had it is a
>>> generic mechanism that may be better defined in a security WG, on the
>>> other we should have a critical mass of people to get the work done
>>> here, if the draft is adopted.
>>> 
>>> Tim
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dnssd mailing list
>>> dnssd@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dnssd mailing list
>> dnssd@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd
> _______________________________________________
> dnssd mailing list
> dnssd@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd