IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnssd] Call for adoption of draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes into DNSSD

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 16 November 2023 20:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D8FC14CE22 for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:49:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5MG6HK_-3-jH for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:49:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf33.google.com (mail-qv1-xf33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f33]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D231FC14F73E for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:49:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf33.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-670e7ae4a2eso21482586d6.1 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:49:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1700167791; x=1700772591; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZPP0zam46ZwKVVFRC9K+6FPuw7P5uZpJdeWWVWL8XYU=; b=fCtIQxFk0puPJ6ZtK2MS6BkweCw6pnDaQ2YIp+T8RUuyWArzPIHF4c1nDCzIdzlMtH W60okC6lTJxSPRDr42hjKARMlrlQzQAzZNaUCugPWBpRrseW6apIN+CckkwBWcSFnZee qV8LPeqVcEw1iEjc0zDrmTQq79GJ2RMmcwW8eRLvNYIP0qP5kDwG9pImWpS+pgbxXPAD nvivXfuLKtOb+A2/9MQSqrAF2jeql/nHwiw0uqZ/jX6bjuIdEHwWCSHVQsPP2U6e830S s3TuWa7vG3KKpIB9pHjE2gNz+95GcXJL+OjG5oqYw8VwvLVP9FI53bHLGW5uerg2ID3Q KEjg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1700167791; x=1700772591; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ZPP0zam46ZwKVVFRC9K+6FPuw7P5uZpJdeWWVWL8XYU=; b=JXOwmf4NW39hAzGW76nXUj09qC+N3Tsm+XgLZt7UeBbKcNFMnxvh5a8p8zlg1zco1I HZff3ZQmjXuqWlrq6VsHk++YEU48YU70Lcct5qXFbVdAB0pyj/y4oJL6g8iCgg6/jwsG 4HMaxRT2z4kKqRu8mS7uAixogKdqcfqoOyX9MlZ73xvsfXwVmuu6r3E0avbovMAQ5q14 PWwzuONgeTdGIx8fruQ+gouHNXjgY3nvPBvWHptdCgfVVwna+MQLPlpRCw4VmynWt/jI qvk1n/OV/pNiqUqKNdZMLD+sIfDtpl/xCYKZ0DMwsUqeTz6Ha8mwnb5CL/vQWy9S8E6y Dtwg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxHjrmf6Dj60XoqWb1Ak5Zsottna9xVY60b7yZKbqvNoFYIOXqK MiwbmWIrAhiLqHyzS5WyT3MI2yoZ8kuEEOQR95dLVw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHgG8vy0dLQL/8vXK32K9RLFs4NLeQD1PREnKZwN2+D/lc/aNsnvNdaeHpRUxmlp6O6IfCf7rLDECTufzZKfbI=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:eb4e:0:b0:66d:670:d425 with SMTP id c14-20020a0ceb4e000000b0066d0670d425mr3845989qvq.31.1700167791510; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:49:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACJ6M16GTqM4ze575WxTc9-s7O6r=GZsY1hWR19soKnSHjWBDQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACJ6M16GTqM4ze575WxTc9-s7O6r=GZsY1hWR19soKnSHjWBDQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:49:15 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1m0x6PQ0w5X53hYBGpTAiT=GkMaswxA8YLzRr0c5gDRoQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Box <chris.box.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: dnssd <dnssd@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000459bbb060a4b29c7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/VoUsILuIQAXsj5r53mJ4aQlypyc>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] Call for adoption of draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes into DNSSD
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 20:49:53 -0000

I support adopting this draft, and am happy to review and implement.

On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 1:08 PM Chris Box <chris.box.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear DNSSD folks,
>
> This message starts a two-week adoption call for
> draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes-08
> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes-08.html>,
> ending at 23:59 on 30th November in any timezone. As discussed in the
> Prague meeting (slides-118-dnssd-multiple-dns-questions
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/118/materials/slides-118-dnssd-multiple-dns-questions-00>)
> this is proposed as a way to permit asking for multiple query types in a
> single DNS query message. This would save capacity on Thread networks,
> where it is common to need to ask for both SRV and TXT.
>
> An alternative existing design is to achieve this with QDCOUNT=2, but such
> a design conflicts with draft-ietf-dnsop-qdcount-is-one
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-qdcount-is-one-01>.
> That DNSOP draft describes the problems encountered when QDCOUNT>1 and
> proposes to require that QDCOUNT<=1.
>
> The chairs consider that draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes-08 is consistent
> with point 2 of the DNSSD charter. Please review the draft and consider
> whether you support its adoption by DNSSD. Please share any thoughts with
> the list to indicate support or opposition. Note that this is not a vote.
>
> If you are willing to provide a more in-depth review, or are willing to
> consider implementing it, please state it explicitly to give the chairs an
> indication of the energy level in the working group willing to work on the
> document.
>
> WG adoption is the start of the process. The fundamental question is
> whether you agree the proposal is worth the WG's time to work on and
> whether this draft represents a good starting point.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris (for the chairs)
>
> _______________________________________________
> dnssd mailing list
> dnssd@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email