Re: [dnssd] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-24.txt
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 02 February 2024 19:58 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9955BC14F5FB for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 11:58:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ljZrkkmm9GWc for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 11:57:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf32.google.com (mail-qv1-xf32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5EC9C14F5EF for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 11:57:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf32.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-68c53ed6c56so12261696d6.3 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Feb 2024 11:57:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1706903876; x=1707508676; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=J5nUR9ZTCpqtr3VdgT66FR8X8Kr8b6CSYYAYo0Ez25c=; b=F8AqUm7fl44Ley/YnK1ix/UXquIuGpzWrTLhOfVbOzioaFylUc5x3AyJMnsgzhEzxI dzn37q/ngQ6FyRPLeuPKqtRdzadgqWcCpTJLsnPmtVqUybtbx5hdppleFFPH5ZahnxQV f3e8NCYqS19qwpJ5G7EKFyt8mETsTJzFXintW6he6EjAviWMqDfSAsYnj5v3DB9X5bPY omiVzhp//XMsEbRoT9m7V4Nkl0LlnvnVmnXfo4YhJ3Fv9bXyNCPMY0AvyKxyZLBc3wzs tjD5ZBaxlGwqWJJirgRffeCrJK+IPKTrnOpZsmGv+dqJELh3n//ZBr73I6wMbSn51ftO 6XCQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706903876; x=1707508676; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=J5nUR9ZTCpqtr3VdgT66FR8X8Kr8b6CSYYAYo0Ez25c=; b=TS2el86LrX8WbjB5//tpmuXxOv+AdzoEdq5ChAUYqEYR1/PV1KKe000vkvH9FFXfRm P2uXagkBpmm8ZtO6XweU3n7hzF7jJ0vg4AXrc3i435daiJSBODPLDbKDyHA54e1D2KVU AsCAyRfQjBJt2OoLUT4M1qxJhZ3mnz6R3x6/GWTA4UiY0UXv2CixIdT0Ehk+laO7Hz2E kRRaQKIw7fg7Gp1hOEjtXAtj1qgck5ROePP9EFyRZJJcc9/ujgarbeZ45kyNJXFTQdv3 +Hgk7Yzf92vTZG1bEJSov1rWAn4lahyuHUZOaC9jx2u8uw912gAYQSM2eINF8wYLmq6a zJ9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzzk/DsX0d2teWWP9brdC2I2ozHFIDL2UOvNdFUq+KVmVZzmqnh aG8Zoc/CFJBAXtzS/7Lm+yzZY5OfDUTo/gSvCesMYHVtQDn3K7fZfhHxyzW5nL4EtXlv7AADNM+ pOwTNPLS7QK5SvS9mE7L4J0NRR3PFJ+qFAujDig==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFYch7Yo2ZNkxds6zkXHjEncX2qylUh1ibcyOeSe5dmGVIYiyvoFrBOudTbrbjRVKDWRd7XzvDrlyVXCTK3smg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2a4a:b0:686:9deb:8e33 with SMTP id jf10-20020a0562142a4a00b006869deb8e33mr7614907qvb.10.1706903875944; Fri, 02 Feb 2024 11:57:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <170657313200.54405.2737407799848935424@ietfa.amsl.com> <CACJ6M16ZeDCTt6HP5j6PWFMNR9tsdgtqi71JHM45m1_JpmAmOw@mail.gmail.com> <5402C5AC-720D-47D6-9107-F113DA54DD33@cisco.com> <CAPt1N1m7wcjEb8prFmR350rX7VoxjjVoJ_aDt4Voz95m_OnOnw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1m7wcjEb8prFmR350rX7VoxjjVoJ_aDt4Voz95m_OnOnw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 14:57:20 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1kZtHCrRRmMBrD4j4Q37=igA7Oi+O4Z_UwCDEWG1xqafQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Chris Box <chris.box.ietf@gmail.com>, "dnssd@ietf.org" <dnssd@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000311b3706106b87f9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/w8mj7ifrdtFMq6rw4oJRmC5YZSw>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-24.txt
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 19:58:02 -0000
Hm, just to clarify, part of what I was expecting of Paul was that if he felt strongly about various points he raised, to which my replies were not "yes, I'll go do that," it would help to hear his reply, which AFAIK never happened. On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 2:56 PM Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote: > A number of the changes Paul asked for are changes I don't think are > advisable or would improve the document. E.g., changing > default.service.arpa to _default._service.arpa. As you say, he never > replied to my reply, which is part of why the document update took so > long—I was waiting for him to reply, and then life suddenly got hard. I > think you may need to pin him down and ask him what his intentions are > during the next informal telechat. > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 9:48 AM Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke= > 40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > >> Chris and Ted, >> >> >> >> Indeed, revision -24 is a big change (mainly editorial and nothing deeply >> technical requiring a Last Call). >> >> >> >> OTOH, I am unsure whether -24 addresses all Paul Wouters’ concerns, >> noting that Paul did not reply to Ted’s reply (about the DISCUSS). >> >> >> >> Ted, do you think that all Paul’s issues have been addressed either in >> your email or in -24 ? If so, then may I suggest to nudge Paul to revisit >> his DISCUSS ballot ? >> >> >> >> Regards and thanks for the -24: nice to see a move >> >> >> >> -éric >> >> >> >> *From: *dnssd <dnssd-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Chris Box < >> chris.box.ietf@gmail.com> >> *Date: *Friday, 2 February 2024 at 12:58 >> *To: *"dnssd@ietf.org" <dnssd@ietf.org> >> *Subject: *Re: [dnssd] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-24.txt >> >> >> >> *Thank you* Ted, for working on this. I know there was a significant >> amount of feedback to address. My (no-hat) opinion is that the text looks >> measurably improved as a result. >> >> >> >> I would encourage everyone to scan through the changes in the diff >> <https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-24>. The >> key test of course is to see if Éric and the wider IESG are happy with -24. >> >> >> >> I feel we are nearly there. >> >> >> >> Chris >> >> >> >> On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 at 00:06, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote: >> >> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-24.txt is now available. It is a work >> item >> of the Extensions for Scalable DNS Service Discovery (DNSSD) WG of the >> IETF. >> >> Title: Service Registration Protocol for DNS-Based Service Discovery >> Authors: Ted Lemon >> Stuart Cheshire >> Name: draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-24.txt >> Pages: 40 >> Dates: 2024-01-29 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dnssd mailing list >> dnssd@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd >> >
- [dnssd] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-24.txt internet-drafts
- Re: [dnssd] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-24.t… Chris Box
- Re: [dnssd] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-24.t… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [dnssd] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-24.t… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnssd] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-24.t… Ted Lemon