IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnssd] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements-03

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Thu, 24 July 2014 19:08 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7501A0A98 for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 12:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.222
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.222 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zFfNmSTPZMqB for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 12:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FD1A1B27A7 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 12:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost.ecs.soton.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s6OJ7IRV016376; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 20:07:18 +0100
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk s6OJ7IRV016376
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=201304; t=1406228838; bh=0q+SujoXfca0Y+tjjTB+EndJY2o=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=WyQ8zhZcsHANXi4ZAIzJ5UN0baZ2CUIQw4aqxKrqJ0KDqZarF9beNpEFjEwjsWj7E PUJzBhHMulfn7FuL1K7KJuulSRlcV4vcplmaPs+9f9ZJ7mR/zBgnmMkVbDyLxtWK0A vgkAK7pjd2MwmjDAArbWAquQdThIW5Gv7BjSzU4g=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk ([2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:401]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:68da]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id q6NK7I0176706116nm ret-id none; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 20:07:18 +0100
Received: from eduroam-v6.meeting.ietf.org (eduroam-v6.meeting.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:67c:370:152:e189:b9ca:8222:7094] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s6OJ6vRn024016 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 24 Jul 2014 20:07:00 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <E496DFBA-8F78-460E-BED8-122BB97A3721@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 20:06:57 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <EMEW3|ed0155d8ddbba18c8093d49842a1bea2q6NK7I03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|74C6BD68-F8EA-45D2-8B8D-B38F726E5075@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <E496DFBA-8F78-460E-BED8-122BB97A3721@gmail.com> <74C6BD68-F8EA-45D2-8B8D-B38F726E5075@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=q6NK7I017670611600; tid=q6NK7I0176706116nm; client=relay,forged,no_ptr,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=2:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: s6OJ7IRV016376
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/y6FBfUWvzcnBSJQ1PivQqfHS_1U
Cc: dnssd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnssd] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements-03
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to Bonjour \(mDNS and DNS-SD\) for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 19:08:47 -0000

Hi Ran,
 
On 24 Jul 2014, at 19:09, RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com> wrote:

> Tim,
> 
> I apologise, but I would really appreciate it if the DNS-SD WG 
> Last Call deadline for this draft were slightly extended, 
> perhaps to 23:59 UK time on July 31st.
> 
> That would permit folks to see today's presentations and discussions,
> re-read the draft based on today's meeting contents, and possibly 
> provide additional review and feedback.
> 
> I don't think such an extension would slow WG progress much.
> It possibly would lead to minor edits to the requirements draft.
> I do think it would increase the review coverage, not just
> from me, but also from other folks based on today's discussions.
> 
> I regret that other matters kept me from providing timely
> feedback during the WG Last Call on this draft.

We have already received a number of useful comments after the formal WGLC deadline, which I believe we should incorporate.

Those comments seem to be relatively minor, but are ones worth incorporating in a revved ID before we pass it up to Ted (who has also reviewed the text and made a small number of - again fairly minor - useful suggestions).

I’ll be working with the authors to address the comments appropriately. I’m not sure yet that we need or should formally extend the WGLC. I’ll happily take Ted’s input on that. For now, I suggest if you have comments, please continue to make them. It also seems Ted plans an IETF Last Call, but it would be desirable to iron out any comments prior to that, so long as we’re following due process.

Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email