IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dots] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks-05: (with COMMENT)

mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Thu, 06 October 2022 06:00 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0592DC1522BD; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 23:00:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XIzRxvA-q7OY; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 23:00:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B55EC1522BC; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 23:00:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar05.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfedar27.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4Mjglk2h1Mz2ypf; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 08:00:34 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1665036034; bh=y4nfgQGRfpExOw+3m37qtMsO2zz4q0KKto5RHJwYflA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=qe5gMrrbaUDPPn1q2MzUS5XtJ8/Los14HHIxwtLnVlcPxYjfNJH/p6Ifax+Dcpetv FDmxawwKJ6vG4hd0skbFTKBe+EzLFxLTb8AByotEM5T4sO5nRJb8y9b8NlAs8+iFTM +VJ2WOCcuGmUE3Qo2LBCencliKwLkR6r85YibwCT5WGYwMACzWeX5oq4Ke/mafcTVP w1jCaqgtAWK6wZ3TXkMiAX5ecz6Yge5aANzdscsuy4mb463em8yx8R9u4nRBIwoNCb bACM24B+lOi2tw+GjxJBz+a5l5kG71s+A3GvA6+NiLCTnh2iu63ajyXus/91hSCWXk B+gBV5shh7iYQ==
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks@ietf.org>, "dots-chairs@ietf.org" <dots-chairs@ietf.org>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>, "valery@smyslov.net" <valery@smyslov.net>
Thread-Topic: Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks-05: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHY2REoP7iQn9944kyNJmstFTJNdq4A3zyQ
Content-Class:
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2022 06:00:33 +0000
Message-ID: <6046_1665036034_633E6F02_6046_6_13_57b5d60f92a1482193617ba55d701a87@orange.com>
References: <166501206973.46010.9846790337731787136@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <166501206973.46010.9846790337731787136@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_SetDate=2022-10-06T05:59:00Z; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Method=Privileged; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Name=unrestricted_parent.2; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_SiteId=90c7a20a-f34b-40bf-bc48-b9253b6f5d20; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_ActionId=460c4f9b-0fb8-4ae9-883d-13545a5b8c7e; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_ContentBits=0
x-originating-ip: [10.115.26.52]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/2R_fYlU0YqYT8QZ3Mt0Yets58PY>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2022 06:00:41 -0000

Hi Martin, 

Thanks for the comment. 

This was fixed as part of Lars review. 

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
> Envoyé : jeudi 6 octobre 2022 01:21
> À : The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc : draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks@ietf.org; dots-chairs@ietf.org;
> dots@ietf.org; valery@smyslov.net; valery@smyslov.net
> Objet : Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-robust-
> blocks-05: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks-05: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to
> all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to
> cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-
> positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT
> positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found
> here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks/
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> COMMENT:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> 
> "NON_PROBING_WAIT:
> is used to limit the potential wait needed calculated when using
> PROBING_RATE."
> 
> I think there is a grammar problem here, and I can't parse this
> definition.
> 
> 


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email