Re: [Dots] WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-05

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Thu, 07 November 2019 09:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658D8120958; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 01:02:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JrDQ04yGSjOC; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 01:02:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D743C12091E; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 01:02:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfedar04.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.6]) by opfedar24.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 477y8n2Hv9z5vmJ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 10:02:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.76]) by opfedar04.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 477y8n18rWz1xpd; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 10:02:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e878:bd0:c89e:5b42]) by OPEXCAUBM7E.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 10:02:33 +0100
From: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
To: Jon Shallow <supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com>, "dots-chairs@ietf.org" <dots-chairs@ietf.org>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>, 'Valery Smyslov' <valery@smyslov.net>
Thread-Topic: [Dots] WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-05
Thread-Index: AQG7u70viJ1zeDaA3CAo0XFND0KMCQHB1wXNATZXnJIBTI+/hwF5oOeRp4UlO2CAAAMg4A==
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 09:02:32 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303135B6FC@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <011d01d58974$b70298b0$2507ca10$@smyslov.net> <1bb901d594b2$b4502b20$1cf08160$@jpshallow.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933031350F27@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <1bf401d594be$6b379700$41a6c500$@jpshallow.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933031358608@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <1ca201d59548$17acc440$47064cc0$@jpshallow.com>
In-Reply-To: <1ca201d59548$17acc440$47064cc0$@jpshallow.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.247]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/3MlAG8aATl8nZl88cHM-6Okh-kk>
Subject: Re: [Dots] WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-05
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 09:02:42 -0000

Re-,

Done in my local copy. Thanks. 

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Jon Shallow [mailto:supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com]
> Envoyé : jeudi 7 novembre 2019 09:48
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN; dots-chairs@ietf.org; dots@ietf.org; 'Valery
> Smyslov'
> Objet : RE: [Dots] WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-05
> 
> Hi Med,
> 
> That suggestion works for me - thanks.  No need to reference HE.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Jon
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dots [mailto: dots-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
> > Sent: 07 November 2019 06:49
> > To: Jon Shallow; 'Valery Smyslov'; dots@ietf.org; dots-chairs@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [Dots] WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-05
> >
> > Hi Jon,
> >
> > OK, thanks.
> >
> > In order to further make things clear, I suggest to add this NEW text in
> the
> > introduction of Section 5:
> >
> >    The list of the IP addresses returned by DHCP servers is typically
> >    used to fed the DOTS server selection procedure detailed in
> >    Section 4.3 of [I-D.ietf-dots-signal-channel] or to provide DOTS
> >    agents with primary and backup IP addresses of their peer DOTS
> >    agents.
> >
> > Would that be OK?
> >
> > I'm not sure the text need to hint any priority order set by the server
> > (backup case), though. The reason is that list will be ordered by the
> client
> > following HE.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Med
> >
> > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > De : Jon Shallow [mailto:supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com]
> > > Envoyé : mercredi 6 novembre 2019 17:23
> > > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN; 'Valery Smyslov'; dots@ietf.org; dots-
> > > chairs@ietf.org
> > > Objet : RE: [Dots] WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-05
> > >
> > > Hi Med,
> > >
> > > Sorry - not thinking straight - yes, you are correct in that a single
> > > OPTION_Vx_DOTS_ADDRESS can contain multiple IP addresses - must have
> > glazed
> > > over the specific definition before hitting the "it MUST only use the
> first
> > > instance" in the next section (Client Behavior).
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Jon
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Dots [mailto: dots-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> > > mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
> > > > Sent: 06 November 2019 15:52
> > > > To: Jon Shallow; 'Valery Smyslov'; dots@ietf.org; dots-
> chairs@ietf.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [Dots] WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-05
> > > >
> > > > Hi Jon,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for the comments.
> > > >
> > > > Please see inline.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Med
> > > >
> > > > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > > > De : Dots [mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Jon Shallow
> > > > > Envoyé : mercredi 6 novembre 2019 15:59
> > > > > À : 'Valery Smyslov'; dots@ietf.org; dots-chairs@ietf.org
> > > > > Objet : Re: [Dots] WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-05
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have read through draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-05 and think
> that
> > > it
> > > > > is
> > > > > a good document.
> > > > >
> > > > > However, in particular with DHCPv(4|6), it is only possible to use
> the
> > > > > first
> > > > > OPTION_Vx_DOTS_ADDRESS (5.1.3, 5.2.3).
> > > >
> > > > [Med] Yes
> > > >
> > > >   If the server at the first address
> > > > > is down / unavailable for whatever reason, it is not possible to
> define
> > > a
> > > > > backup IP address as a secondary entry.  Is it the intention to not
> > > allow
> > > > > backup IP addresses?
> > > >
> > > > [Med] Hmm, that is possible given that an instance is designed to
> carry a
> > > list
> > > > of IP addresses.
> > > >
> > > >    If the DHCP client receives OPTION_V6_DOTS_ADDRESS only, the
> > > >    address(es) included in OPTION_V6_DOTS_ADDRESS are used to reach
> > the
> > > >    ^^^^^^^^^^
> > > >    peer DOTS agent.  In addition, these addresses can be used as
> > > >    identifiers for authentication.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > With DNS, I know that A/AAAA records can be presented round-robin
> > > > which
> > > > > gives the possibility of backup IP addresses, but am not sure
> whether
> > > this
> > > > > holds true for implementations for other Resource Records.  If
> backup
> > > > > addresses are to be allowed, the draft is unclear whether only the
> > > first
> > > > > A/AAAA RR is allowed, or each can be tested until the first
> non-failure
> > > is
> > > > > found, or whether happy-eyeballs it to be invoked against all of
> the
> IP
> > > > > addresses and then the final IP preferentially chosen according to
> the
> > > RR
> > > > > returned order.
> > > >
> > > > [Med] Considerations related to address selection (including HE) are
> not
> > > > detailed here on purpose because this is not part of discovery.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > Jon
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Dots [mailto:ietf-supjps-dots-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of
> > > > Valery
> > > > > > Smyslov
> > > > > > Sent: 23 October 2019 08:37
> > > > > > To: dots@ietf.org
> > > > > > Cc: dots-chairs@ietf.org
> > > > > > Subject: [Dots] WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-05
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > this message starts a Work Group Last Call (WGLC) for
> > > > > draft-ietf-dots-server-
> > > > > > discovery-05.
> > > > > > The version to be reviewed is here:
> > > > > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dots-
> > > > > > server-discovery-05.txt
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The WGLC will last for two weeks and will end on November the
> 7th.
> > > > > > Please send your comments to the list before this date.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Frank & Valery.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Dots mailing list
> > > > > > Dots@ietf.org
> > > > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Dots mailing list
> > > > > Dots@ietf.org
> > > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Dots mailing list
> > > > Dots@ietf.org
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dots mailing list
> > Dots@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots