[Dots] Next action: draft-hayashi-dots-dms-offload-usecase

H Y <yuuhei.hayashi@gmail.com> Wed, 03 April 2019 06:17 UTC

Return-Path: <yuuhei.hayashi@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E5012004F for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 23:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g3_TRScUQVxK for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 23:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x131.google.com (mail-lf1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0FD4120019 for <dots@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 23:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x131.google.com with SMTP id g7so10759546lfh.10 for <dots@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 23:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WG0NFtXB5k5bRxgAtE4gfHW8RdoDkaovzO4L4QTTsLo=; b=t0osgWr0bWls4WXzLv3vzCs0e9noqv+oA/swA7Rizpz/BDyK3p0wdGx/isnEKd8M0Y si4tBYA9Iq4DhCOSFnN4P8saH2OsBf7GkMpjgE/0cQT3KWOOMY+g9BkopdL0HaWdtu8l +86XqaUrrjnaXPVpE1w8eMLqQcFdOGO5WJMjkEeoc2Dprvd4FROWXktiVH1fZDrxTbA7 2x9KAt/sD75NJ0PMwtx4tD1pJLHl7x2JzlQWiC0E6ozhckn/mfaDgQsgoN+aFK/YP+h+ 3ATubn3X2NoRlB2mDtBUBtezncEy3qsQwejG8zrc/2n03NveDz3Zq5NN56wh7PrsrCaD 2vmQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WG0NFtXB5k5bRxgAtE4gfHW8RdoDkaovzO4L4QTTsLo=; b=FNqy28/3Sco/HfvGkAXwLWDuTcpZ/1MLVmasP36fLqSIEm1+3N5iDI7XiBq9AKCDxH 8ct9hBlmgCy0MGyjDZgozroK9G2+MssayvaDvcO/afjweR1P5xyTD2Q97Olj6TwFFQFk oOsNuGtKZqYGX6N5DaPWxHfjb7c4bZNFqQUPKmvbXXoSifQPfYnpN6fpn/YmPrLLluN1 OmnS8NmCn7lWuw9cuEdQ4PMsD3e5NkvXgBedLVZTDNkbrADdmKUzaMUpaI/kDA/s0QnW u9tsRtztK/4KIEKWiPoe8cJXPy/jB6sczKcrTwfYitM7ZZVwnn8FMyKffm+WVVAqmKE3 KlRg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUuRCc2/L6JKyLXKoZQ1KAdFmDi3DTuZhro/DaN2vqkVwprcYWc DEaMJTAexRkcqrWQpZpcJ4OA7Jdl60I76YXaFJ+Zlzfi
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz6oM4DM25fDJAoTcO+X1a8OAkg9PeVxZmtV2s8iNcGpgRAqRWobBDcjivUtfeUrOMMvKLq+rap3CPl/S+SGow=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5c5a:: with SMTP id s26mr4417443lfp.109.1554272252706; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 23:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: H Y <yuuhei.hayashi@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 15:17:24 +0900
Message-ID: <CAA8pjUMjdM0hWT0ZNJz0-Q+e2pURRWS3oSiTzN-03SVKKsorHw@mail.gmail.com>
To: dots@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000081c38a05859a352e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/ADfZFHl0VbepNbHCxoFGzc63_dI>
Subject: [Dots] Next action: draft-hayashi-dots-dms-offload-usecase
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 06:17:37 -0000

Hi all,

Thank you for giving me feedback at IETF104. Based on the feedback of WG
and co-authors, I would like to modify my draft in the following policy.

1) Insert JSON Example of DOTS signaling into "Case: Mitigation Request via
In-band Link".
2) Clarify deployment considerations into both "Case: DOTS Request via
Out-of-band Link " and "Case: Mitigation Request via In-band Link".

I suppose that "Case: DOTS Request via Out-of-band Link " doesn't require
no expansion of current Data Channel. However, I suppose that "Case:
Mitigation Request via In-band Link" requires some expansion of current
Signal Channel such as the source-* clauses defined in
reddy-dots-home-network.

I will share my draft after modification.

Thanks,
Yuhei

-- 
----------------------------------
Yuuhei HAYASHI
08065300884
yuuhei.hayashi@gmail.com
iehuuy_0220@docomo.ne.jp
----------------------------------