Re: [Dots] 2nd WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-21

["Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy" <[e-mail]>]

I hold no IPR for this draft.

-Tiru

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dots <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of
> [e-mail]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 11:05 AM
> To: Roman Danyliw <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [Dots] 2nd WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-21
> 
> This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or
> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> 
> Hi Roman,
> 
> To help preparing the write-up, I don't have any IPR related to this specification.
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Dots [mailto:[e-mail]] De la part de Roman Danyliw
> > Envoyé : vendredi 10 août 2018 22:25 À : [e-mail] Objet : Re:
> > [Dots] 2nd WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-21
> >
> > Hello WG!
> >
> > Tiru/Med/Prashanth/Andrew/Nik: thank you for resolving all feedback on
> > the signal draft provided during WGLC.
> >
> > After review of the WGLC feedback and the latest -22, this document
> > appears to be ready to progression.  The chairs will work to get it shepherded.
> >
> > Roman
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [e-mail]
> > > [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 10:23 AM
> > > To: Roman Danyliw <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> > > Subject: RE: 2nd WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-21
> > >
> > > Hi Roman, WG,
> > >
> > > A new version which addresses the comments raised during the WGLC is
> > > available online. The changes are as follows:
> > >
> > > Major:
> > >
> > > - Mitigation on loss: this is now defined as an attribute of
> > > mitigation requests. Added NEW text to clarify the corresponding
> > > behavior (include when conflicts with immediate mitigation requests)
> > > and update the YANG module.
> > >
> > > Minor:
> > >
> > > - Mandate the use of Observe option: this is coherent with the tone
> > > used in previous versions + the corresponding RFC is already
> > > classified as
> > normative.
> > > - Add a note for implementers to set the type of the CoAP message (Minor).
> > > This is a behavior offered by RFC7641, but it is worth to remind
> > > implementers to set this as NON for mitigation notifications.
> > > - Define a behavior to ease mid rollover.
> > > - Add an explicit statement that PUT used for efficacy update is
> > > handled as
> > a
> > > refresh request.
> > >
> > > Editorial
> > > - Reorganize some parts of the text for better readability
> > > - Fix nits
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Med
> > >
> > > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > > De : Dots [mailto:[e-mail]] De la part de Roman
> > > > Danyliw Envoyé : lundi 23 juillet 2018 20:55 À : [e-mail]
> > > > Objet : [Dots] 2nd WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-21
> > > >
> > > > Hello!
> > > >
> > > > Consistent with our discussion at the Montreal meeting, we are
> > > > starting a second working group last call (WGLC) for the DOTS
> > > > Signal
> > > Channel draft:
> > > >
> > > > DOTS Signal Channel Specification
> > > > draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-21
> > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-21
> > > >
> > > > Please send comments to the DOTS mailing list -- feedback on
> > > > remaining issues or needed changes; as well as endorsements that
> > > > this draft is
> > ready.
> > > >
> > > > This WGLC will end on August 5, 2018.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Roman
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Dots mailing list
> > > > [e-mail]
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dots mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dots mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots