[Dots] Implementation details for signal channel

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Tue, 21 August 2018 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F3C130EF6 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 07:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XsIZ7sYNmz1H for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 07:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from veto.sei.cmu.edu (veto.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 433C9130EF5 for <dots@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 07:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by veto.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w7LEem4b020929 for <dots@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 10:40:48 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 veto.sei.cmu.edu w7LEem4b020929
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1534862448; bh=Innr+0SMrf9VlMf8YEKQB2u6EU7yI/UIKudDDMcsgow=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=HX4shszV0E/eGrfEgl6m+kRKt4vvmGyCJhU/yUhFQ6tWrqVbmPIirtqPdJQiwvuap J81bweCYzKx3C/8va5BjnvTC/RYL3Bhg5KGGOKn7cpuD+fM9ufUYGWMugT9EG3w0jC UhNnig686rn2GopN/fB17pGjnHhOq+7a6ckP45cI=
Received: from CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cascade.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.248]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w7LEellm016578 for <dots@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 10:40:47 -0400
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.248]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 10:40:47 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Implementation details for signal channel
Thread-Index: AdQ5XN1am0OI2z0GTP+kojGKUBBZHA==
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 14:40:46 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC014C4327E7@marathon>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/eXc4wHmLHm29xPEp6AxH_E7Qz-U>
Subject: [Dots] Implementation details for signal channel
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 14:40:51 -0000

Hello!

As part of the shepherding write-up on document quality (Question 2 of [1]) for draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel [2], an up-to-date list of implementations would be helpful.  We currently have a list on the wiki [3].  If you have updates (go-dots and Arbor; NCC Group's reference has been updated) or have an implementation to add, please let us know.

Roman

[1] http://www6.ietf.org/iesg/template/doc-writeup-qa-style.html
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel/
[3] https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dots