IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Dots] draft-fu-dots-ipfix-extension revised into draft-fu-dots-ipfix-tcp-tracking

"Zhenghui (Marvin)" <marvin.zhenghui@huawei.com> Mon, 13 March 2017 07:37 UTC

Return-Path: <marvin.zhenghui@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CCC1294B3 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mugGPICdgAqY for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E55041294B2 for <dots@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DIT61123; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:37:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMI401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.75.33) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:37:22 +0000
Received: from SZXEMI507-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.223]) by SZXEMI401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.75.33]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:37:17 +0800
From: "Zhenghui (Marvin)" <marvin.zhenghui@huawei.com>
To: "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-fu-dots-ipfix-extension revised into draft-fu-dots-ipfix-tcp-tracking
Thread-Index: AdKbyycv4ZM58GBcQp6mg2Ssqy0mug==
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:37:17 +0000
Message-ID: <F8F4995E43962F4996B280E9678CED0001538042@SZXEMI507-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.135.87.2]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F8F4995E43962F4996B280E9678CED0001538042SZXEMI507MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090206.58C64C34.0008, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.8.223, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 9713ffd8d974b18a82db4ab695d2037e
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/Cj0DbzZ7_StrSYgqy6rSU8cDb98>
Subject: [Dots] draft-fu-dots-ipfix-extension revised into draft-fu-dots-ipfix-tcp-tracking
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:37:29 -0000

Hello DOTS WG,

We have submitted a draft draft-fu-dots-ipfix-tcp-tracking-00, which is the succession of draft-fu-dots-ipfix-extension-01.
The original draft has been reviewed internally. As a result,  the IPFIX Information Elements inside the draft have been revised, and some of the IEs are removed.

However, we’ve realized what our draft intends to do is not what currently DOTS WG is focusing on.
So, we’d like to hear from the WG, is that some pointers can be given on the next step of the draft, or where we can continue the discussion of the issue that the draft addresses.

We submitted this draft to DOTS because IPFIX WG had been closed, and DOTS was the best match we found.

Thanks.

Marvin Zhenghui
Best Regards

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email