Re: [Dots] Re Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nishizuka-dots-inter-domain-mechanism-00.txt

"Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org> Wed, 09 March 2016 14:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC2D12DFB4 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 06:51:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Wppg2gEqAqt for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 06:51:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from plainfield.sei.cmu.edu (plainfield.sei.cmu.edu [192.58.107.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6F4A12D6D4 for <dots@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 06:35:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pawpaw.sei.cmu.edu (pawpaw.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.22]) by plainfield.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4/1408) with ESMTP id u29EZXun001799; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 09:35:33 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cert.org; s=jthatj15xw2j; t=1457534133; bh=Id3f/bf+rjgfQb96wHEXJ41VRkkRMYOT7nUM9OzzW7Y=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Sender: Reply-To:Cc; b=iLIk7kgUaqHeQMfn5GiqLH8FpEnqcPJxfQBxaFTwZdsgePPa8XoxXp0Amu/ZesxAp jKlG8Z1NjZ6zB8azWsEmbIXlHOdBf5gSp5sH7TZaumZEQVxyWhfGOCrotPZkl6UII8 QK4Eoq+zHky9vYA+c1kUCMXRrMmLvfThqPGtuqTI=
Received: from CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cascade.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.248]) by pawpaw.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4/1543) with ESMTP id u29EZNXJ019410; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 09:35:23 -0500
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.248]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 09:35:22 -0500
From: "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>
To: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Dots] Re Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nishizuka-dots-inter-domain-mechanism-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRecoaiEP38PIt/0KOrWcGenmb159RBC8AgAApXJA=
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 14:35:22 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFCD96E1B49@marathon>
References: <20160219143213.18440.22155.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <56C729D0.2080707@nttv6.jp> <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFCD96E1534@marathon> <C02846B1344F344EB4FAA6FA7AF481F12AEF923E@SZXEMA502-MBS.china.huawei.com> <4F40EBBE-F985-4567-AFC6-7373EF46C684@arbor.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F40EBBE-F985-4567-AFC6-7373EF46C684@arbor.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/Tpa2Lf2YFuElGEwDwlTnjTvLL9k>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Re Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nishizuka-dots-inter-domain-mechanism-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 14:51:47 -0000

Hello!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dots [mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Roland Dobbins
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 2:05 AM
> To: dots@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Dots] Re Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nishizuka-
> dots-inter-domain-mechanism-00.txt
> 
> On 9 Mar 2016, at 13:08, Xialiang (Frank) wrote:
> 
> > I’m asking because DOTS is chartered to be inter-domain.
> > [Frank]: maybe and not sure right now. It needs more consideration and
> > discussion.
> 
> DOTS is intended to function both inter- and intra-domain.  All the
> requirements for inter-domain operation mesh with the requirements for
> intra-domain operation, and vice versa.

Right.  I misspoke.  DOTS is absolutely chartered to be inter and intra-domain.

I meant to ask whether draft-nishizuka-dots-inter-domain-mechanism-00 is proposing different protocols for each instance -- intra vs. inter.

Roman