IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dots] Re Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nishizuka-dots-inter-domain-mechanism-00.txt

"Roland Dobbins" <rdobbins@arbor.net> Wed, 09 March 2016 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <rdobbins@arbor.net>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0525612E113 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 08:07:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arbor.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OQMSjjlRwNZE for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 08:07:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22b.google.com (mail-pf0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC62E12E16F for <dots@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 07:58:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 129so43920170pfw.1 for <dots@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 07:58:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arbor.net; s=m0; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version; bh=UgDN1xRKfZE5duBzkdla3MukkxhCy6lCiIAlNNZxef0=; b=mWF/jThrCxgtQ8ISekM+HwKDN7LuZNdRV+VikF/9g4fj0QEITEwdiLR2RUpqctNHJq 6M6Io7mjFZihUy5lek8RlhNIdwKHPOKNgMD+BTOrkZLlCJL3gvX1+lVo7twYZVOo/wsd tzaFEMF9EYpJfp+L5PHqTDgph0h/25YextrL0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=UgDN1xRKfZE5duBzkdla3MukkxhCy6lCiIAlNNZxef0=; b=iU7+xcymNuXP0R3xEpeNnt3J7wqpnd1cKe9ybvli7pc0zOBmpyD2cVFQTcyXe+Ds6S 3hA2NGGvE194V4YdC6v5XG1uh8zcgIWEk1x3diP6B4dDhhoQTKwOiRDWt1dHE1qD86jP /gx70b6xq+uzgX589vNqPbWADisqLw+dms99gzQbuieKLesWrTbsZswvOHT/STC4809J DekfiMJESTp/4XzCaPiaseRZZEiAWIVz3Nk0JxxtsZU3a/66ed7yy/kqm54e8X1+i5lK DjgbaVsqN1mDLx3KnmFbbH8YIwOrsfJGBrETIzP5LCq9+3cbX+rAwGeQalGaFIOrG2RY FfTg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJ1T9TZkSRfefsu10QomgVlIDFoBJJHk5VsOLO/cD3gawpDcmNK6FClwIaLAoiJjevY
X-Received: by 10.98.67.76 with SMTP id q73mr27793996pfa.137.1457539109245; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 07:58:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.19.254.115] (202-176-81-112.static.asianet.co.th. [202.176.81.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id wx3sm13427064pab.25.2016.03.09.07.58.27 for <dots@ietf.org> (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Mar 2016 07:58:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net>
To: "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 22:58:25 +0700
Message-ID: <D386F390-218C-4FB1-BEA0-E37C01DDE999@arbor.net>
In-Reply-To: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFCD96E1B49@marathon>
References: <20160219143213.18440.22155.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <56C729D0.2080707@nttv6.jp> <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFCD96E1534@marathon> <C02846B1344F344EB4FAA6FA7AF481F12AEF923E@SZXEMA502-MBS.china.huawei.com> <4F40EBBE-F985-4567-AFC6-7373EF46C684@arbor.net> <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFCD96E1B49@marathon>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5226)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/_ikkV-lnLjmtOvupPv8jigvCnwk>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Re Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nishizuka-dots-inter-domain-mechanism-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:07:15 -0000

On 9 Mar 2016, at 21:35, Roman D. Danyliw wrote:

> I meant to ask whether draft-nishizuka-dots-inter-domain-mechanism-00 
> is proposing different protocols for each instance -- intra vs. inter.

Gotcha.

There are several concerns with this draft, as noted previously.  It 
wasn't apparent that proposing different protocols for inter- vs. 
intra-domain communications was one of those concerns, but perhaps I 
missed something?

Both stateful and stateless transport options should be available for 
both inter- and intra-domain communications, due to local variations in 
network access policies, etc.

-----------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email