[Dots] 答复: merging requirements and use cases drafts?
"Xialiang (Frank)" <frank.xialiang@huawei.com> Mon, 20 March 2017 01:33 UTC
Return-Path: <frank.xialiang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45AA129443 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 18:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.222
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.222 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dzhn3TJo-YBf for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 18:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E533D1243F6 for <dots@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 18:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DDB66555; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 01:28:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.39) by lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 01:28:09 +0000
Received: from DGGEML502-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.80]) by DGGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:28:06 +0800
From: "Xialiang (Frank)" <frank.xialiang@huawei.com>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
CC: "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Dots] merging requirements and use cases drafts?
Thread-Index: AQHSkSlHPjfCqL/HTUaPO9bSB5JdCKF+D3eQgAARtRCAAAJBUIAZ5tgQgACbHgCABGotMA==
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 01:28:05 +0000
Message-ID: <C02846B1344F344EB4FAA6FA7AF481F12BAA559B@DGGEML502-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <CE7B264D-CAC1-41DF-8650-702E120BFBF9@arbor.net> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009E1989A@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <ce1550b82eeb4250a12c1f09622cfd45@XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com> <E58182C4A35A8E498E553AD3D33FA00101171A327B@ILMB2.corp.radware.com> <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC0104F1D124@marathon> <44a6b86f-f3ec-9635-4935-df8bcd627858@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <44a6b86f-f3ec-9635-4935-df8bcd627858@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.135.43.91]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020205.58CF302A.00AC, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.2.80, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 0c229ea5d1d51db97e7e514b8c4b457e
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/X3kCzGU4fSkt-25nwAirlEKFxCQ>
Subject: [Dots] 答复: merging requirements and use cases drafts?
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 01:33:45 -0000
Hi all, I see these two drafts have their respective values, and prefer to keeping them separate. Thanks! B.R. Frank -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Dots [mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Flemming Andreasen 发送时间: 2017年3月17日 22:01 收件人: Roman Danyliw; dots@ietf.org 主题: Re: [Dots] merging requirements and use cases drafts? I think both are valuable and prefer keeping them separate. -- Flemming On 3/16/17 4:47 PM, Roman Danyliw wrote: > Hello all! > > Any additional opinions on how to handle the WG requirements and use case drafts? > > Roman > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dots [mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ehud Doron >> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 4:14 AM >> To: Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) <tireddy@cisco.com>; >> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com; Mortensen, Andrew >> <amortensen@arbor.net>; dots@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [Dots] merging requirements and use cases drafts? >> >> All >> >> +1 on that, I prefer to keep them separate. >> >> Thanks, Ehud >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dots [mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tirumaleswar >> Reddy (tireddy) >> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 11:08 AM >> To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com; Mortensen, Andrew >> <amortensen@arbor.net>; dots@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [Dots] merging requirements and use cases drafts? >> >> I prefer to keep them separate. >> >> -Tiru >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Dots [mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >>> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 1:37 PM >>> To: Mortensen, Andrew <amortensen@arbor.net>; dots@ietf.org >>> Subject: Re: [Dots] merging requirements and use cases drafts? >>> >>> Hi Andrew, all, >>> >>> I have an alternate proposal: >>> * Maintain the requirements draft with its initial scope. >>> * Abandon the use cases draft. >>> >>> I don't see much value in publishing the use case I-D as an RFC. The >>> requirements I-D is really important as it sketches the scope and >>> required DOTS functionalities. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Med >>> >>>> -----Message d'origine----- >>>> De : Dots [mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Mortensen, >>>> Andrew Envoyé : lundi 27 février 2017 19:43 À : dots@ietf.org Objet : >>>> [Dots] merging requirements and use cases drafts? >>>> >>>> During the interim meeting, Kathleen Moriarty observed that it >>>> might be beneficial to merge the requirements and use cases drafts, >>>> since the IESG tends to look more favorably on such drafts. >>>> >>>> We did not continue that discussion during the interim meeting, due >>>> to limited time, but I think it’s something we need to discuss >>>> ahead of the meeting in Chicago. To begin with, I’d like to hear a >>>> little more from Kathleen about why a merged draft is likely to be >>>> more palatable to the IESG. If nothing else, it’d be nice to avoid >>>> coming to the topic cold in Chicago. >>>> >>>> andrew >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Dots mailing list >>>> Dots@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Dots mailing list >>> Dots@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots >> _______________________________________________ >> Dots mailing list >> Dots@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots >> _______________________________________________ >> Dots mailing list >> Dots@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots > _______________________________________________ > Dots mailing list > Dots@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots _______________________________________________ Dots mailing list Dots@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
- [Dots] merging requirements and use cases drafts? Mortensen, Andrew
- Re: [Dots] merging requirements and use cases dra… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Dots] merging requirements and use cases dra… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Dots] merging requirements and use cases dra… Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: [Dots] merging requirements and use cases dra… Ehud Doron
- Re: [Dots] merging requirements and use cases dra… Roman Danyliw
- Re: [Dots] merging requirements and use cases dra… Roland Dobbins
- Re: [Dots] merging requirements and use cases dra… Flemming Andreasen
- [Dots] 答复: merging requirements and use cases dra… Xialiang (Frank)
- Re: [Dots] 答复: merging requirements and use cases… Daniel Migault
- Re: [Dots] 答复: merging requirements and use cases… kaname nishizuka