IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dots] Items from shepherd review of draft-ietf-dots-architecture

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Thu, 07 February 2019 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A6F124C04 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 07:17:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IOXT5XlUzINw for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 07:17:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from veto.sei.cmu.edu (veto.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8D8E1228B7 for <dots@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 07:17:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from korb.sei.cmu.edu (korb.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.30]) by veto.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x17FHqBr016801; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 10:17:52 -0500
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 veto.sei.cmu.edu x17FHqBr016801
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1549552672; bh=UYJb8StnY6H2wLFnmajpLhygpMWavhy3sf5IJh6mSFM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=DaHogsETsVMiNPwxh0P8WmDOxonzd6nBFeeP86MUW9q1uWeOtWii0BJ8FMt8HTx+V h6thXePnBZJVd+dXS8eqptCWKQCGgPyp40lQKtKpv+YIjhMXwQLeFIl/0uyv29kiBH NX6Rwzad1Lvs2xV71rsuTvw572Esvbr6d4vV0cBE=
Received: from CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cascade.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.248]) by korb.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x17FHqL6026523; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 10:17:52 -0500
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.248]) with mapi id 14.03.0435.000; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 10:17:52 -0500
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: "Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy" <TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@mcafee.com>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Items from shepherd review of draft-ietf-dots-architecture
Thread-Index: AdS8u2RatjXyeujWSNi2qQvwlChSXQBO5xBwAEBIdYA=
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 15:17:51 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01857B7C62@marathon>
References: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01857A7D95@marathon> <BYAPR16MB27908E40DA41132B041D6D5BEA6F0@BYAPR16MB2790.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR16MB27908E40DA41132B041D6D5BEA6F0@BYAPR16MB2790.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/XYItnLLk96vMa3vD0vbRZUi_MIE>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Items from shepherd review of draft-ietf-dots-architecture
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 15:17:55 -0000

Hi Tiru!

Thanks for these changes.  I'm now just waiting on the IPR statements to progress the document.

Roman

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
> [mailto:TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@mcafee.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2019 3:41 AM
> To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>; dots@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Items from shepherd review of draft-ietf-dots-architecture
> 
> Hi Roman,
> 
> Please see inline
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dots <dots-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Roman Danyliw
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 12:34 AM
> > To: dots@ietf.org
> > Subject: [Dots] Items from shepherd review of
> > draft-ietf-dots-architecture
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > I found a few issues using idnits when completing my shepherd write-up
> > of draft-ietf-dots-architecture.  Could these please be fixed and a -11
> published.
> >
> > (1) No IANA Considerations section.  While there is no action for
> > IANA, the next needs to explicitly say something to that effect.  See
> > Section2.2 of https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist
> 
> Fixed.
> 
> >
> > (2) A few of the references need to be updates.  From IDnits:
> >
> > --[ snip ]--
> >   == Outdated reference: A later version (-18) exists of
> >      draft-ietf-dots-requirements-16
> >
> >   == Outdated reference: A later version (-17) exists of
> >      draft-ietf-dots-use-cases-16
> >
> >   == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang has been published
> as RFC
> >      8512
> 
> Updated
> 
> >
> >   -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 5246
> >      (Obsoleted by RFC 8446)
> 
> We discussed reference to RFC5246 in DOTS signal channel draft with
> Benjamin, see
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/n6UQxjvffL4i7hxk0o6D3eRjV20
> I have updated the text as follows:
> 
> This challenge might
> in part be mitigated by use of resumption via a PSK in TLS 1.3 [RFC8446] and
> DTLS 1.3 [I-D.ietf-tls-dtls13] (session resumption in TLS 1.2 [RFC5246] and
> DTLS 1.2 [RFC6347])
> 
> Cheers,
> -Tiru
> 
> > --[snip]--
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Roman
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dots mailing list
> > Dots@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email