Re: [Dots] FW: Prior discussion about draft-fu-ipfix-network-security-00
"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 24 March 2015 14:15 UTC
Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011051A8755 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 07:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.611
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v-vMLK8aOIUc for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 07:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com [72.246.2.115]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8311A8753 for <dots@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 07:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C47A47661; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:15:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com [172.17.121.112]) by prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362E647681; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:15:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cas1.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.30]) by prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D08D80040; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:15:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.913.22; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:14:29 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB2.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.102]) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.102]) with mapi id 15.00.0913.011; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:14:29 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com>, Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Dots] FW: Prior discussion about draft-fu-ipfix-network-security-00
Thread-Index: AQHQZbIoYSEet5nfrUeQVeu01A8Lvp0rBeQAgAAy8ICAAAs2AIAAGBUAgABeRoCAAAu8gIAABRaA///iJWA=
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:14:28 +0000
Message-ID: <81a3873e7a7c48e0993e5994f08a5b29@usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <358188D97DBE45F787E97C9E29B1C0A3@takeAsus> <D1360207.B412%nteague@verisign.com> <77FA386512F0D748BC7C02C36EB1106D955C93@szxeml557-mbs.china.huawei.com> <1C9F17D1873AFA47A969C4DD98F98A75153AC9EA@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <D1364C2B.B4E6%nteague@verisign.com> <0CB8640B8D094438BD4A4793DAD0F3B7@takeAsus> <10B310D1-09A0-4C9F-B01C-F25DFA360981@standardstrack.com> <55115149.2070700@htt-consult.com>
In-Reply-To: <55115149.2070700@htt-consult.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.19.113.3]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/cdJPvoZqldb1dg0GaDu5s7lS-88>
Subject: Re: [Dots] FW: Prior discussion about draft-fu-ipfix-network-security-00
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:15:05 -0000
Well, there's ASN.1 XER which can go to DER, which I'm not seriously suggesting. But was CBOR (IETF RFC 7049) already considered? -- Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies IM: rsalz@jabber.me Twitter: RichSalz
- [Dots] Prior discussion about draft-fu-ipfix-netw… Roman D. Danyliw
- Re: [Dots] Prior discussion about draft-fu-ipfix-… Hedanping (Ana)
- Re: [Dots] Prior discussion about draft-fu-ipfix-… Robert Moskowitz
- [Dots] DOTS List Eric Burger
- Re: [Dots] DOTS List Kathleen Moriarty
- [Dots] FW: Prior discussion about draft-fu-ipfix-… Roman D. Danyliw
- Re: [Dots] Prior discussion about draft-fu-ipfix-… Roman D. Danyliw
- Re: [Dots] FW: Prior discussion about draft-fu-ip… Takeshi Takahashi
- Re: [Dots] FW: Prior discussion about draft-fu-ip… Teague, Nik
- Re: [Dots] FW: Prior discussion about draft-fu-ip… Hedanping (Ana)
- Re: [Dots] FW: Prior discussion about draft-fu-ip… Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
- Re: [Dots] FW: Prior discussion about draft-fu-ip… Teague, Nik
- Re: [Dots] FW: Prior discussion about draft-fu-ip… Takeshi Takahashi
- Re: [Dots] FW: Prior discussion about draft-fu-ip… Eric Burger
- Re: [Dots] FW: Prior discussion about draft-fu-ip… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Dots] FW: Prior discussion about draft-fu-ip… Takeshi Takahashi
- Re: [Dots] FW: Prior discussion about draft-fu-ip… Andrew Mortensen
- Re: [Dots] FW: Prior discussion about draft-fu-ip… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Dots] FW: Prior discussion about draft-fu-ip… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Dots] FW: Prior discussion about draft-fu-ip… will
- Re: [Dots] FW: Prior discussion about draft-fu-ip… Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
- [Dots] 答复: FW: Prior discussion about draft-fu-ip… Xialiang (Frank)