IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dots] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-dots-requirements-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Andrew Mortensen <andrewmortensen@gmail.com> Fri, 22 February 2019 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <andrewmortensen@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D58812941A; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 07:02:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j9bQczGEEVbF; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 07:02:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x12d.google.com (mail-it1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F37C612EB11; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 07:02:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id z131so3303428itf.5; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 07:02:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=XGCsqTCmmL67VIBMMrADEFrocujw7jEjlyvhbevpo70=; b=YuWEmOLEzfr1VrPD1/oDrMe1Q5LB9pqWU2KPcu1ibM3NP/MEDZFNetGT4ehfq9D38m 1WpyrZwb4Z7//sCnp2Nj7iHGsWPBwDD9so0VwaOC+5p8JKxiYKkDfyALIdP+1xENdyTO FAU2YjLb8dpwfRrxqM/h48j7ho9Z87FCm5Y3HGjsgt7AQsGwDLYH0Ti6dk1ctJZuJG5L SN9AkZUqzElhxyQJt4OaqsLYMC0S/5n3MyeREwI4S+G+kaeHRAccP7ODNNPVDuVNGW5+ hSwo0A/8P0dj5Tf5oYobgiyRmaNe04EsCLS84OkqeW0r53tHhXEyrVpCSAVuFWffTpDm uUFA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=XGCsqTCmmL67VIBMMrADEFrocujw7jEjlyvhbevpo70=; b=q2ffAK12pJNAwpQ275BbQY524fSaHyydaI9Kb6n/J5FGf+ml/Xb6mpCvTphCe5T6Jb ubpnHZg7wJ8WnUbVtWNQrR95h3gvUZxs4OAIURfvxD8CDUv6kl9p5K2UDwztFtJTA2Bq 4CvLpHcbNueFJEW6k1HUyzfXl+OZ8tUlfzsIXXpjmUrNKOAN1VVegBv8t96sFpbRQqsw sNi6p58CtI5PscH51FPyAx/tP2ypc676Ps6h3pyIsXJc/VtIxhbHjdqaoPYRYQxV2kyM S5taLnLCI3WI6/45rv0XCGuceBf58KFk63VjknOJJ+oGtZDuV/l/t5Cnug2yD0pqiOlu eqGw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuaEMk+ILkiLEoVllmTs6DRoPLd4kRQGjdUrK9wKz6dwKUttm8qg gPO0I8S5ANxSVfQKaMT/34s=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3Iaufdes4BlmCofYoHlfrpETHzA2NbdZQQBm4JyONZK+ofz5S3hGjnrlsCIvs00eD5SV+fq5yQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a24:1fc5:: with SMTP id d188mr2363967itd.61.1550847751085; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 07:02:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.110] (c-73-145-178-129.hsd1.mi.comcast.net. [73.145.178.129]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m25sm711151iti.16.2019.02.22.07.02.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Feb 2019 07:02:30 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
From: Andrew Mortensen <andrewmortensen@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <85EA2A21-3C7C-4C8E-A72F-56026958D7E4@moretension.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 10:02:29 -0500
Cc: "Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy" <TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@mcafee.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "dots-chairs@ietf.org" <dots-chairs@ietf.org>, "frank.xialiang@huawei.com" <frank.xialiang@huawei.com>, "draft-ietf-dots-requirements@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dots-requirements@ietf.org>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F8D867FA-2F71-4FFD-9EF6-FAF8A732D08A@gmail.com>
References: <155076138334.8654.4433425046363509880.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <BYAPR16MB27907AFCEC70695076EFD2B9EA7F0@BYAPR16MB2790.namprd16.prod.outlook.com> <CABcZeBOAYzwf1SzdEJWwGgd3z3t+nGeJ1i4GW58OOwoDtLCn5w@mail.gmail.com> <85EA2A21-3C7C-4C8E-A72F-56026958D7E4@moretension.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/exQc5umDCKsjybP0Il9e5F_9lh0>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-dots-requirements-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:02:35 -0000

See below.

> On Feb 22, 2019, at 8:41 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> …snip...
> 
>> 
>> 
>> S 2.2.
>>>        active DOTS client has not requested mitigation, in order to
>>>        control load.
>>> 
>>>        Following mutual authentication, a signal channel MUST be
>>>        considered active until a DOTS agent explicitly ends the session.
>>>        During peace time, signal channel MUST be considered active
>>> until
>> 
>> "peace time" is probably not the right word here. After all, my country might
>> be at peace but still subject to a DoS attack
> 
> Added the following term to avoid confusion :
> Peacetime: In DDoS, ‘peacetime’ refers to the period during which the target network is not under DDoS attack.
> 
> If you must, but I think this is might be considered a little in bad taste by people who are involved in actual wars.

I think we can just change the text to “When no attack traffic is present, the signal channel MUST be….” No need for the extra definition.

andrew

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email