Re: [Dots] Adoption call for draft-nishizuka-dots-signal-control-filtering-06

Dan Wing <> Mon, 15 April 2019 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB621200D7; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fMFFrKhmlZjl; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C962120098; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id g12so8933681pll.11; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=4LoURNqxMO22uPPkW+Bag98KVt47WoYHJJ+6eRTTsPs=; b=Ttcnn+uZfy31FePC4Wk7ZRRFvJCbszZDW6XfXo68/1S5kCmeAhTjnjIYFAPmY2QTR8 YPtewiQsRB1qssY4OPWVDlGNnon6WGbyQVo2G0H18wrRkrRfKs5+5f/ADhoouaNzUf8j lwrr4W77JsXp27DOJ9QGjgit+6PpwwCxdPcyZ250rM1y8kHRb/gIySS496yhrcwFyiMD BRqm/uo95lbmOefk75ccgbaaFG3r8pGK+4zombed3lSdyPAbz1SDxjzV112zjVCrbzAd 0H3ZuDXirxROA0Pthlt/JwTj1mf9vQzRzC5Tn/5PvK2BYMhDkOFMMVwXr7z+GQSJOChg XZQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=4LoURNqxMO22uPPkW+Bag98KVt47WoYHJJ+6eRTTsPs=; b=VahcnNmW/cQvfqY6ls/sl7zYdONFb0H+U9JwFUtyZ/kgNHj5IePXGIk+mpPIk3+Jyd 2CEwQiHzOeY6v73Ofh1AlqGz6bQxa5v3ha1JzNs31xqNZ6YqRkvlf+v4Hp5LUi8wn8PY dQ0PnNv5p0Z+fWoaOGLNMbbLO8+IHisRP+yoNbO6h9vqnlnDtOWqTFqRWeJze8lTkI/k pRrWXVqtu6EOJwaRe3oFkso38rK/vsdNl0fNuz29ZIA2OvrEm7Y4OBEaWgGNm7hHpEv+ a9SgwMyzdeenJE9/t4tkaxUhITaxHwazdnJ/MPTq1JeR6J8hyxz7sHigPSJ+sgygDEHs FJng==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXBE26h7xVnH/lckyNqyvJIOKL9OpjBHxDmAgUPpWB6xaF2UF+a cY4BJIJ9avKHdYS8FsLJwwmtgYaA
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwZomfElPXPM+YRs6HnZm/AzLBbL4Ymnc7cq2KBVOYFPHo8EpFuzCz6p4HxKOGMeYIFGuCv3w==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b089:: with SMTP id p9mr51550061plr.185.1555351495295; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjcldanwi.lan ([]) by with ESMTPSA id q80sm97744438pfa.66.2019. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
From: Dan Wing <>
In-Reply-To: <023e01d4ee1f$c3892950$4a9b7bf0$>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:04:52 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <023e01d4ee1f$c3892950$4a9b7bf0$>
To: Valery Smyslov <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Adoption call for draft-nishizuka-dots-signal-control-filtering-06
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 18:04:59 -0000

I support adoption of this draft.

Nit: I am nervous it is unnecessarily re-stating normative behavior in its Section 3.2.1 -- normative behavior of acl-name and activation-type which should only be located in draft-ietf-dots-data-channel.  It's difficult to tell if the subtle word differences are intended to change behavior or simply restate the behavior described in draft-ietf-dots-data-channel.  I would just remove the text that mimics draft-ietf-dots-data-channel and simply point off to draft-ietf-dots-data-channel.


> On Apr 8, 2019, at 8:28 AM, Valery Smyslov <> wrote:
> Hi all,
> the chairs recently received an adoption request for draft-nishizuka-dots-signal-control-filtering-06.
> This message starts a two-week adoption call for draft-nishizuka-dots-signal-control-filtering-06.
> The call ends up on Tuesday, April the 23rd.
> Please send your opinion regarding adoption of this document to the list before this date.
> If you think the draft should be adopted, please indicate whether you're willing 
> to review it/to work on it. If you think the draft should not be adopted, please explain why.
> Regards,
> Frank & Valery.
> _______________________________________________
> Dots mailing list