SMTP draft issues (4)
DRUMS WG Chair <chris.newman@innosoft.com> Thu, 17 August 2000 17:36 UTC
Received: from cs.utk.edu (CS.UTK.EDU [128.169.94.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA01185 for <drums-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 13:36:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id NAA14273; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 13:35:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.13); Thu, 17 Aug 2000 13:35:22 -0400
Received: by cs.utk.edu (cf v2.9s-UTK) id NAA14247; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 13:35:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (marvin@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id NAA14231; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 13:35:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (192.9.25.1 -> mercury.Sun.COM) by cs.utk.edu (smtpshim v1.0); Thu, 17 Aug 2000 13:35:19 -0400
Received: from westmail2.West.Sun.COM ([129.153.100.30]) by mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA14495 for <drums@cs.utk.edu>; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 10:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nifty-jr.west.sun.com (nifty-jr.West.Sun.COM [129.153.12.95]) by westmail2.West.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL, v1.7) with ESMTP id KAA07247 for <drums@cs.utk.edu>; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 10:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 10:15:52 -0700
From: DRUMS WG Chair <chris.newman@innosoft.com>
To: Detailed Revision/Update of Message Standards <drums@cs.utk.edu>
Subject: SMTP draft issues (4)
Message-ID: <2689063.3175496152@localhost>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.3 (MacOS)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:drums-request@cs.utk.edu?Subject=unsubscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I am tracking the following issues (in reverse time order): "Negotiated noncompliance" Unless 3 additional people express support, debate is closed "RSET scope issue" Debate is open. Rough concensus on proposal if no objections by 2000-08-24 "smtpupd-12: <SP> optional in replies?" (Eric Allman's proposed text) Debate is open. Rough concensus on proposed change if no objections by 2000-08-21. "smtpupd-12: Four letter command verbs" Debate is open. Rough concensus on proposal to delete words "four letter" from section 2.4 if no objections by 2000-08-21. "smtpupd-12: MAIL resets state tables and buffers" (John Beck's proposed text) Debate is open. Rough concensus on proposed change if no objections by 2000-08-21. "Conflict between X.1.9(iv) and literal interpretation of draft-12" Unless 2 additional people express support, debate is closed "suggested revision for MUST/SHOULD" Rough concensus reached, document revision in progress. - DRUMS WG Chair
- SMTP draft issues (4) DRUMS WG Chair
- Re: SMTP draft issues (4) DRUMS WG Chair