Re: [Dtls-iot] Updated BOF information

Corinna Schmitt <schmitt@ifi.uzh.ch> Tue, 30 July 2013 09:51 UTC

Return-Path: <schmitt@ifi.uzh.ch>
X-Original-To: dtls-iot@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtls-iot@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F29F11E80D5 for <dtls-iot@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 02:51:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.781
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.781 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.816, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x6b20s0oY-v2 for <dtls-iot@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 02:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ladislav.ifi.uzh.ch (ladislav.ifi.uzh.ch [130.60.156.19]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BF111E80DF for <dtls-iot@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 02:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from authenticated sender schmitt by ladislav.ifi.uzh.ch (postfix) with ESMTPSA id SA; <6E7D476056>
Message-ID: <51F78C8F.6020505@ifi.uzh.ch>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:51:11 +0200
From: Corinna Schmitt <schmitt@ifi.uzh.ch>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Olaf Bergmann <bergmann@tzi.org>
References: <6C306372-9817-46E6-AD5B-6059E302BFCC@sensinode.com> <51F74C30.30905@ifi.uzh.ch> <053A4975-F6BD-4B4B-BC07-D869F00F4DF8@sensinode.com> <87fvuwe9wj.fsf@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <87fvuwe9wj.fsf@tzi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010806040008040903020509"
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at ladislav
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: Zach Shelby <zach@sensinode.com>, dtls-iot@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dtls-iot] Updated BOF information
X-BeenThere: dtls-iot@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DTLS for IoT discussion list <dtls-iot.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtls-iot>, <mailto:dtls-iot-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dtls-iot>
List-Post: <mailto:dtls-iot@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtls-iot-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtls-iot>, <mailto:dtls-iot-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:51:41 -0000

Dear Olaf,

thanks for your remark.
I think authentication is a big topic especially for constraint devices.

And yes, I agree for team up.
Due to many travelling I will arrive in Berlin late afternoon and have 
to leave tomorrow evening again.
Perhaps we can find some time to discuss it  as soon as possible. 
Tomorrow morning I am free. So if any one has time we can meet.
I stay at the Pestana Berlin Tiergarten, but will be at the meeting 
location after breakfast.

For the dinner tonight I have no ticket. So I cannot join if no one has 
one for me.

Regards,
Corinna


Reiseplan: Druckvorschau


Am 30.07.13 10:20, schrieb Olaf Bergmann:
> Zach Shelby <zach@sensinode.com> writes:
>
>> Hi Corinna,
>>
>> On Jul 30, 2013, at 7:16 AM, Corinna Schmitt <schmitt@ifi.uzh.ch> wrote:
>>
>>> Just for information concerning our draft
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schmitt-two-way-authentication-for-iot-00:
>>> We already started to implemented a solution and evaluated a little
>>> bit. So we would be glad if our draft will be approved and stay in
>>> DICE.
>> Your draft was actually discussed yesterday in the CoRE WG meeting in
>> the scope of general authentication and authorisation in CoRE. This
>> subject will be out of scope for the first DICE charter as we already
>> have a couple concrete problems to solve. It is not clear where the
>> "AA" work will end up, probably in some other new working group, or
>> maybe in some future re-chartering of DICE.
> The discussion yesterday was a bit low on the guidance level how to
> proceed. Even if this topic is not the most pressing for DICE, I highly
> recommend to work on this space *now*.
>
> Corinna, maybe we could team up with the other authors of the relevant
> drafts to find out what the next steps are? We had a quick talk with
> Göran yesterday, and he also had the impression that the WG could have
> been more active in giving feedback on these drafts.
>
> Gruesse
> Olaf
> _______________________________________________
> dtls-iot mailing list
> dtls-iot@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtls-iot
>


--