Re: [dtn-interest] [Fwd: Re: [IRSG] POLL: draft-irtf-dtnrg-arch-07 -- DUE 30 Oct]

Scott Burleigh <Scott.Burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov> Sun, 05 November 2006 15:46 UTC

Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by webbie.berkeley.intel-research.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id kA5FkvY08160 for <dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 07:46:57 -0800
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (really [24.48.215.188]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20061105154641.FUCU1620.mta11.adelphia.net@[127.0.0.1]>; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 10:46:41 -0500
Message-ID: <454E0762.5050500@jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 07:46:42 -0800
From: Scott Burleigh <Scott.Burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Welzl <michael.welzl@uibk.ac.at>, dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] [Fwd: Re: [IRSG] POLL: draft-irtf-dtnrg-arch-07 -- DUE 30 Oct]
References: <1162278274.4775.11.camel@lap10-c703.uibk.ac.at> <454717B7.6060401@cs.tcd.ie> <454D475B.7060900@jpl.nasa.gov> <000d01c700b5$ebcbc8b0$0200a8c0@fun> <454E042A.3030107@jpl.nasa.gov>
In-Reply-To: <454E042A.3030107@jpl.nasa.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dtn-interest-admin@mailman.dtnrg.org
Errors-To: dtn-interest-admin@mailman.dtnrg.org
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.dtnrg.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Delay Tolerant Networking Interest List <dtn-interest.mailman.dtnrg.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.dtnrg.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.dtnrg.org/pipermail/dtn-interest/>

Scott Burleigh wrote:
> Where BSRs are absent, no BSRs are ever issued.

Sorry, a typo I noticed way too late:

Where *BRLs* are absent, no BSRs are ever issued.

Scott