[dtn-interest] update to sdnv draft
Wesley Eddy <weddy@grc.nasa.gov> Thu, 31 August 2006 20:20 UTC
Received: from mx2.grc.nasa.gov (mx2.grc.nasa.gov [128.156.11.69]) by webbie.berkeley.intel-research.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k7VKKMY12026 for <dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:20:22 -0700
Received: from lombok-fi.grc.nasa.gov (seraph1.grc.nasa.gov [128.156.10.10]) by mx2.grc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC29C2EF for <dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:20:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from apataki.grc.nasa.gov (apataki.grc.nasa.gov [139.88.112.35]) by lombok-fi.grc.nasa.gov (NASA GRC TCPD 8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7VKKGCs002165; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:20:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by apataki.grc.nasa.gov (NASA GRC TCPD 8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7VKKF67001257; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:20:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from apataki.grc.nasa.gov ([127.0.0.1])by localhost (apataki.grc.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)with ESMTP id 28445-16; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:20:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from drpepper.grc.nasa.gov (gr2134391.grc.nasa.gov [139.88.44.123])by apataki.grc.nasa.gov (NASA GRC TCPD 8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7VKKBHU001212; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:20:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by drpepper.grc.nasa.gov (Postfix, from userid 501)id 788404FCB7; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:20:52 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:20:52 -0400
From: Wesley Eddy <weddy@grc.nasa.gov>
To: ltp@masaka.cs.ohiou.edu, dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org
Message-ID: <20060831202052.GB9622@grc.nasa.gov>
Reply-To: weddy@grc.nasa.gov
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i
X-imss-version: 2.042
X-imss-result: Passed
X-imss-scores: Clean:22.31064 C:2 M:4 S:5 R:5
X-imss-settings: Baseline:1 C:1 M:1 S:1 R:1 (0.0000 0.0000)
Subject: [dtn-interest] update to sdnv draft
Sender: dtn-interest-admin@mailman.dtnrg.org
Errors-To: dtn-interest-admin@mailman.dtnrg.org
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.dtnrg.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Delay Tolerant Networking Interest List <dtn-interest.mailman.dtnrg.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.dtnrg.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.dtnrg.org/pipermail/dtn-interest/>
All of the helpful comments that I received on the SDNV draft were incorporated into an update: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-eddy-dtn-sdnv-01.txt I think this clarifies some of the questions people have had around SDNVs and the decisions that were made. I think it is fairly complete and do not want to spend too many more cycles on it. I'm not certain if it has any utility as either an RG document or an individual submission to the RFC-editor, or if it should just be left to expire. Opinions from implementers of BP and/or LTP would be helpful in deciding. -- Wesley M. Eddy Verizon Federal Network Systems
- [dtn-interest] Re: [ltp] update to sdnv draft Stephen Farrell
- [dtn-interest] update to sdnv draft Wesley Eddy
- RE: [dtn-interest] update to sdnv draft Symington, Susan F.
- Re: [dtn-interest] update to sdnv draft Scott Burleigh