RE: [dtn-interest] update to sdnv draft
"Symington, Susan F." <susan@mitre.org> Fri, 01 September 2006 15:31 UTC
Received: from smtp-mclean.mitre.org (smtpproxy2.mitre.org [192.80.55.71]) by webbie.berkeley.intel-research.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k81FVUY20608 for <dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:31:30 -0700
Received: from smtp-mclean.mitre.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-mclean.mitre.org (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id k81FVTWb030407 for <dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 11:31:29 -0400
Received: from smtp-mclean.mitre.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-mclean.mitre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4362A1BD7A for <dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 11:31:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imcfe2.MITRE.ORG (imcfe2.mitre.org [129.83.29.4]) by smtp-mclean.mitre.org (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k81FV7mE029921; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 11:31:25 -0400
Received: from IMCSRV4.MITRE.ORG ([129.83.20.161]) by imcfe2.MITRE.ORG with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 1 Sep 2006 11:31:07 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: RE: [dtn-interest] update to sdnv draft
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 11:31:06 -0400
Message-ID: <8E507634779E22488719233DB3DF9FF0F74766@IMCSRV4.MITRE.ORG>
In-Reply-To: <44F84D5E.7030501@jpl.nasa.gov>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [dtn-interest] update to sdnv draft
Thread-Index: AcbN2RzCNRFw7Ei3QSahAvD1E6o6CwAAlO7Q
From: "Symington, Susan F." <susan@mitre.org>
To: Scott Burleigh <Scott.Burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>, ltp@masaka.cs.ohiou.edu, dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Sep 2006 15:31:07.0543 (UTC) FILETIME=[A4F10A70:01C6CDDB]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by webbie.berkeley.intel-research.net id k81FVUY20608
Sender: dtn-interest-admin@mailman.dtnrg.org
Errors-To: dtn-interest-admin@mailman.dtnrg.org
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.dtnrg.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Delay Tolerant Networking Interest List <dtn-interest.mailman.dtnrg.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.dtnrg.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.dtnrg.org/pipermail/dtn-interest/>
I agree with Scott. This SDNV usage document should not just be left to expire. It will be useful to be able to use it as a reference. -susan ***************************************************************** Susan Symington The MITRE Corporation susan@mitre.org 703-983-7209 (voice) 703-983-7142 (fax) ****************************************************************** >-----Original Message----- >From: dtn-interest-admin@mailman.dtnrg.org >[mailto:dtn-interest-admin@mailman.dtnrg.org] On Behalf Of >Scott Burleigh >Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 11:10 AM >To: ltp@masaka.cs.ohiou.edu; dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org >Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] update to sdnv draft > >Wesley Eddy wrote: >> All of the helpful comments that I received on the SDNV draft were >> incorporated into an update: >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-eddy-dtn-sdnv-01.txt >> >> I think this clarifies some of the questions people have had around >> SDNVs and the decisions that were made. I think it is >fairly complete >> and do not want to spend too many more cycles on it. I'm >not certain if >> it has any utility as either an RG document or an individual >submission >> to the RFC-editor, or if it should just be left to expire. >Opinions from >> implementers of BP and/or LTP would be helpful in deciding. >> >I think this is really helpful and well-written, Wes; I would hate to >see this good work wasted, and it would potentially be very >handy to be >able to reference such a document in future I-Ds and RFCs. >I'd like to >see it submitted as an informational RFC one way or another. > >Scott > > >_______________________________________________ >dtn-interest mailing list >dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org >http://mailman.dtnrg.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest >
- [dtn-interest] Re: [ltp] update to sdnv draft Stephen Farrell
- [dtn-interest] update to sdnv draft Wesley Eddy
- RE: [dtn-interest] update to sdnv draft Symington, Susan F.
- Re: [dtn-interest] update to sdnv draft Scott Burleigh