Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done?
"Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)" <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov> Fri, 20 November 2009 13:44 UTC
Received: from ndmsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov (ndmsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.0.122]) by maillists.intel-research.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nAKDiaYW011234 for <dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:44:36 -0800
Received: from ndjsppt03.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsppt03.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.102]) by ndmsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3280148069; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:44:35 -0600 (CST)
Received: from ndjshub05.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjshub05.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.4.164]) by ndjsppt03.ndc.nasa.gov (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAKDia5H012567; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:44:36 -0600
Received: from NDJSSCC03.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.4.170]) by ndjshub05.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.4.164]) with mapi; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:44:36 -0600
From: "Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)" <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org" <dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:44:03 -0600
Thread-Topic: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done?
Thread-Index: Acpp5vBf8+NM5oI9RsWNK0VyoyF7cAAAA+wg
Message-ID: <3A5AA67A8B120B48825BFFCF54438561945EA7EAD9@NDJSSCC03.ndc.nasa.gov>
References: <0830158984ee20a93393902c5b1d8e2c.squirrel@webmail.scss.tcd.ie> <4AF30014.9080600@cs.tcd.ie> <4AFA80C4.8040305@cs.tcd.ie> <4B0698D9.9080408@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <4B0698D9.9080408@cs.tcd.ie>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2009-11-20_10:2009-11-16, 2009-11-20, 2009-11-20 signatures=0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by maillists.intel-research.net id nAKDiaYW011234
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done?
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Delay Tolerant Networking Interest List <dtn-interest.maillists.intel-research.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@maillists.intel-research.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/pipermail/dtn-interest>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@maillists.intel-research.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@maillists.intel-research.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:44:37 -0000
My colleague, Alan Hylton is working on CBHE for DTN2 as we need this for interoperability between ION and DTN2. The current ION implementation defaults to CBHE. Anyway, this should provide an independent implementation of CBHE so long as we do not try and lift the ION code. Any ambiguities in the specification hopefully will be indentified during this process. --Will >-----Original Message----- >From: .. Stephen Farrell >Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 8:26 AM >To: dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org >Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? > > >So I've started the IRSG review for the 5 drafts >named below. ..... >draft-irtf-dtnrg-cbhe
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? Burleigh, Scott C (313B)
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? Symington, Susan F.
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? Peter Lovell
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? L.Wood
- [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? stephen.farrell
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? Anders Lindgren
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? Alex McMahon
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dtn-interest] SDNVs and bit patterns [was Re… Elwyn Davies
- Re: [dtn-interest] SDNVs and bit patterns [was Re… Stephen Farrell
- [dtn-interest] how many checksum ciphersuites? (w… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? Lloyd Wood
- Re: [dtn-interest] SDNVs and bit patterns [was Re… Burleigh, Scott C (313B)
- [dtn-interest] SDNVs and bit patterns [was Re: DT… Elwyn Davies
- [dtn-interest] Re(2): DTNRG docs that are....done? Peter Lovell
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? Anders Lindgren
- [dtn-interest] Re(2): DTNRG docs that are....done? Peter Lovell
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? Lloyd Wood
- [dtn-interest] 40 Years Later, Looking Back At Th… Oyake, Amalaye (316D)
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? Zhongtian Jia
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? Rajesh Krishnan
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG docs that are....done? Stephen Farrell