[dtn-security] RFC6257 errata
Amy Alford <aloomis@sarn.org> Tue, 05 February 2013 23:23 UTC
Return-Path: <aloomis@sarn.org>
X-Original-To: dtn-security@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-security@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3CDB21F8901 for <dtn-security@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 15:23:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UX6xrpXCm7x9 for <dtn-security@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 15:23:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qc0-f179.google.com (mail-qc0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE10621F8605 for <dtn-security@irtf.org>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 15:23:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id b40so287502qcq.24 for <dtn-security@irtf.org>; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:23:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=b6iwWvSnSJnc0+t5FaAhyKYm/Ax7u8dQMw97i9BikJY=; b=fpCm8Dw6zJW3krlp1d5Tz9tjoAHrq+rkmYHEMWP74o89JD/E43aSJuorTaAJpEcNos LuUpfBUfNN/63vlmcW7EWEQaGBTH++59u/f1qAVSnhmeOFRn+t3QOMtpxefv8RwSzXqt dhgqXOQabfcxnaO4uBp7OR4RGDvK5hZ3v3yPVTc8xFcldMcUY9xcHX6Bh6EoCeAbF2tL 1z1boOHOBQg8C76smaE3xmK3VfF3BVkQhBQltb6SS6OcjFk2t09fNH1/Y0/8RSza83Db URj7Wyo6gm2cBB68rjQtNtTwR9c+I3+AdE5mQ2mGrpPapKVjh6i2hwNafJgDDUoneK0m hQ8A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.110.1 with SMTP id l1mr20420728qap.21.1360106613073; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:23:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.83.100 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 15:23:32 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 18:23:32 -0500
Message-ID: <CAB9rx+8V-inPtEaViOr9irxMEqbVvaorKPi5VhvCGQy7youhuA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Amy Alford <aloomis@sarn.org>
To: dtn-security@irtf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf3074d56087659504d5027f89"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmpVU+/BkvHCi3QXHyarYbll93WY5l0+fdhloCfLgrWckg15rZbCmpXnmHgTt9J2rHAAXmQ
Subject: [dtn-security] RFC6257 errata
X-BeenThere: dtn-security@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Security." <dtn-security.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-security>, <mailto:dtn-security-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/dtn-security>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-security@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-security-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-security>, <mailto:dtn-security-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 23:23:34 -0000
Security parameter 11, "block type of encapsulated block" doesn't have any format specified. ESB states that it's an optional security parameter for ESB blocks, but doesn't specify the format either. Since block types are a single byte, this doesn't really need to be SDNV encoded. - Amy
- [dtn-security] RFC6257 errata Amy Alford