[dtn-security] Including fragment offset in the correlator doesn't prevent all fragment collisions.
Amy Alford <aloomis@sarn.org> Tue, 19 March 2013 23:24 UTC
Return-Path: <aloomis@sarn.org>
X-Original-To: dtn-security@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-security@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF2B21F8BB6 for <dtn-security@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9YlTx8IXao+v for <dtn-security@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22a.google.com (mail-qc0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E02121F86CA for <dtn-security@irtf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id d42so528966qca.1 for <dtn-security@irtf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=9xo67vMdWTUq9wFQ+tFk+fk35FfmIuYRl8E+WchPqbQ=; b=HVbdOwysIdC3jAXqwZQb9pzWnd0yV1eKVBwKSVOVWbVhdc3ZrqOPAIEMGTqJ2zrDRK rXSkzc7m7omWiOxZqclc6ua2iBb+v6T+iPwKB+B4JOUmCOkFrIA8T80dWr7Ky8SgvjAs Vqo6ew5zTvioH3qp8KahIHpZSr3QIYFgNIAszKr0ETFpVO5OuQtE//UVmdNDbbkr0JBa rdR49mDwpHjzrG7jhC5eSe9mK+QeQzl6FQTQSFmhe5pVKetdrVTpejfTyWb25/Dpl6lY SwGXXt+WnCeBeUVUGAnXc7HXLuSHAuKd+KT3ic3TMoEL0IuPSP2pUscr23OHTDaaMB5m W25A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.97.132 with SMTP id l4mr3999420qan.65.1363735465100; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.24.38 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 19:24:24 -0400
Message-ID: <CAB9rx+85HHsNj=EhmsqhCdtY5k=S4p1Jgzz4VsmEC+43ERygWA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Amy Alford <aloomis@sarn.org>
To: dtn-security <dtn-security@irtf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf3074b350f8680d04d84f67fd"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkx3BKBX5yV6qYD9QoyjbCNIYLPxR8hg4wc6xwmM0jfJvyNjOKYXweuyataOmx7yXNwDP9n
Subject: [dtn-security] Including fragment offset in the correlator doesn't prevent all fragment collisions.
X-BeenThere: dtn-security@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Security." <dtn-security.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-security>, <mailto:dtn-security-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/dtn-security>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-security@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-security-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-security>, <mailto:dtn-security-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 23:24:26 -0000
A bundle can be fragmented multiple times independently, so a node may receive multiple fragments with the same offset and length that have traveled different paths (and accumulated different BSP blocks along the way). Collisions in the correlator values once the bundle is reassembled are inevitable. - Amy
- Re: [dtn-security] Including fragment offset in t… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dtn-security] Including fragment offset in t… Amy Alford
- [dtn-security] Including fragment offset in the c… Amy Alford
- Re: [dtn-security] Including fragment offset in t… Peter Lovell
- Re: [dtn-security] Including fragment offset in t… Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)
- Re: [dtn-security] Including fragment offset in t… Elwyn Davies
- Re: [dtn-security] Including fragment offset in t… Amy Alford
- Re: [dtn-security] Including fragment offset in t… Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)
- Re: [dtn-security] Including fragment offset in t… Amy Alford
- Re: [dtn-security] Including fragment offset in t… Amy Alford
- [dtn-security] Re(2): Including fragment offset i… Peter Lovell
- [dtn-security] Re(4): Including fragment offset i… Peter Lovell
- Re: [dtn-security] Re(4): Including fragment offs… Amy Alford
- Re: [dtn-security] Re(4): Including fragment offs… Elwyn Davies
- Re: [dtn-security] Re(4): Including fragment offs… Amy Alford
- Re: [dtn-security] Re(4): Including fragment offs… Burleigh, Scott C (313B)
- Re: [dtn-security] Re(4): Including fragment offs… Amy Alford
- Re: [dtn-security] Re(4): Including fragment offs… Burleigh, Scott C (313B)
- Re: [dtn-security] Re(4): Including fragment offs… l.wood
- Re: [dtn-security] Re(4): Including fragment offs… Amy Alford
- Re: [dtn-security] Re(4): Including fragment offs… Burleigh, Scott C (313B)
- Re: [dtn-security] Re(4): Including fragment offs… Burleigh, Scott C (313B)
- Re: [dtn-security] Re(4): Including fragment offs… Amy Alford
- Re: [dtn-security] Re(4): Including fragment offs… Burleigh, Scott C (313B)