Re: [dtn-security] [dtn-interest] list reply-to (was: Re: DTN Time Sync Issues)
Michael Demmer <demmer@cs.berkeley.edu> Thu, 03 April 2008 02:12 UTC
Received: from gateway0.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (gateway0.EECS.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.60.93]) by maillists.intel-research.net (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m332CSQ6000742; Wed, 2 Apr 2008 19:12:28 -0700
Received: from zabar.research.intel-research.net (bldmz-nat-161-164.berkeley.intel-research.net [12.155.161.164]) (authenticated bits=0) by gateway0.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (8.14.2/8.13.5) with ESMTP id m332JCAX013277 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 2 Apr 2008 19:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Michael Demmer <demmer@cs.berkeley.edu>
To: Delay Tolerant Networking Interest List <dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>, dtn-security <dtn-security@mailman.dtnrg.org>, dtn-users mailing list <dtn-users@mailman.dtnrg.org>
In-Reply-To: <F6C959D0-BD79-4AFC-AC8A-A109B2D842BE@cs.berkeley.edu>
References: <20080331223048.GA27216@firebird1.grc.nasa.gov> <47F1C779.3050302@jpl.nasa.gov> <A3A356E39B867E4380966B0EB600C28FE36380@NDJSEVS23A.ndc.nasa.gov> <47F2524D.9080507@jpl.nasa.gov> <47F25726.9090606@masaka.cs.ohiou.edu> <47F26124.2010800@jpl.nasa.gov> <47F270A2.6010104@masaka.cs.ohiou.edu> <47F29820.4020502@jpl.nasa.gov> <47F2A307.4030907@masaka.cs.ohiou.edu> <47F2AD86.5050705@jpl.nasa.gov> <003d01c89443$c6831c20$53895460$@com> <47F2BB7C.1080309@jpl.nasa.gov> <006901c8944e$0c385f00$24a91d00$@com> <47F3A0DB.3080202@bbn.com> <200804021609.m32G9Xu06193@cisco.com> <47F3B761.1010808@cs.tcd.ie> <699BE83D-98F2-43DE-B467-374B7206CD19@cs.berkeley.edu> <64AFAE11-A6F8-4CF6-951D-0D2E2F3E6B35@cs.berkeley.edu> <F6C959D0-BD79-4AFC-AC8A-A109B2D842BE@cs.berkeley.edu>
Message-Id: <231C40CD-2EF6-4C8B-954A-A28B12F9F4EC@cs.berkeley.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Applemailsentby: demmer
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2)
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:19:06 -0700
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2)
Subject: Re: [dtn-security] [dtn-interest] list reply-to (was: Re: DTN Time Sync Issues)
X-BeenThere: dtn-security@mailman.dtnrg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DTN Security Discussion <dtn-security.mailman.dtnrg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-security>, <mailto:dtn-security-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/pipermail/dtn-security>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-security@mailman.dtnrg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-security-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-security>, <mailto:dtn-security-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 02:12:32 -0000
Sorry, I should clarify this a bit: I changed the mailing list configuration so that it does no Reply-To munging at all. Any Reply-To headers that are set by the poster are left intact, but no Reply-To headers are added by the mailing list itself. -mike On Apr 2, 2008, at 6:47 PM, Michael Demmer wrote: > > Given that no-one seems to prefer the current behavior, I've modified > the mailing list configuration so that the Reply-To defaults to send > only to the poster rather than to the whole list. > > I've done the same on the dtn-users and dtn-security lists as well. > > -mike > > > On Apr 2, 2008, at 6:04 PM, Kevin Fall wrote: >> I don't really recall having a preference one way or another.... >> >> - K >> >> On Apr 2, 2008, at Apr 212:02 PMPDT, Michael Demmer wrote: >> >>>>> Can this behaviour be changed? It's been annoying me for _months_. >>>> >>>> I've no problem with that. Anyone else care? >>>> >>>> S. (Who doesn't manage the list as it happens.) >>> >>> I'd be happy to make the change, as I have access to the list >>> administrative interface. >>> >>> I think I remember that when we set up the list, Kevin had a >>> preference for the current default behavior, so I'd like to hear his >>> opinion before making the change. I think he's on vacation this week >>> so we'll see when he replies. >>> >>> -m >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dtn-interest mailing list >>> dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org >>> http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dtn-interest mailing list >> dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org >> http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest > > _______________________________________________ > dtn-interest mailing list > dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org > http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest
- Re: [dtn-security] [dtn-interest] list reply-to (… Michael Demmer
- Re: [dtn-security] [dtn-interest] list reply-to (… Michael Demmer