[dtn-security] security layer
<M.Bhutta@surrey.ac.uk> Thu, 03 April 2008 11:43 UTC
Received: from mail83.messagelabs.com (mail83.messagelabs.com [195.245.231.83]) by maillists.intel-research.net (8.13.8/8.13.7) with SMTP id m33Bh4Cj002256 for <dtn-security@mailman.dtnrg.org>; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 04:43:05 -0700
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: M.Bhutta@surrey.ac.uk
X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-83.messagelabs.com!1207223357!46450915!39
X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.12.14.2; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [131.227.102.140]
Received: (qmail 6047 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2008 11:49:45 -0000
Received: from ads40.surrey.ac.uk (HELO ads40.surrey.ac.uk) (131.227.102.140) by server-3.tower-83.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2008 11:49:45 -0000
Received: from EVS-EC1-NODE4.surrey.ac.uk ([131.227.102.139]) by ads40.surrey.ac.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 3 Apr 2008 12:49:39 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C89580.CBEB4252"
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:49:38 +0100
Message-ID: <676D5FD21A8EEC4591C13839BF2A14B9F166F1@EVS-EC1-NODE4.surrey.ac.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: security layer
Thread-Index: AciVgMuhUBb6lLUyRmWNlNlgXapscQ==
From: M.Bhutta@surrey.ac.uk
To: dtn-security@mailman.dtnrg.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Apr 2008 11:49:39.0245 (UTC) FILETIME=[CC16ADD0:01C89580]
Subject: [dtn-security] security layer
X-BeenThere: dtn-security@mailman.dtnrg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DTN Security Discussion <dtn-security.mailman.dtnrg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-security>, <mailto:dtn-security-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/pipermail/dtn-security>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-security@mailman.dtnrg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-security-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-security>, <mailto:dtn-security-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:43:07 -0000
Hello, When we design a secure system, the security should be provided at each layer to make a good secure system. If we develop a system on top of DTN based network, then which layer will be best suitable to provide security extensions. Suppose, we have underlying sensor network and on top DTN as overlay network, which layer we should provide the security services for such system. I think, to get benefits like, generic solution, we should introduce security extensions to bundle layer ... Bundle Layer Security Transport Layer Network Layer Data Link Layer Physical Layer Please comment on this and appropriate suggestions for building a security architecture for overlay network on top of sensor networks. Nasir
- Re: [dtn-security] security layer Peter Lovell
- [dtn-security] security layer M.Bhutta