Re: [dtn] [EXTERNAL] DTN WG updated charter milestones

"Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B)" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov> Wed, 18 September 2019 20:08 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE7A120953; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:08:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jpl.nasa.gov
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SJ-SF0V-PpeD; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:08:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov (ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0B25120086; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:08:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1]) by ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8IK55w1183929; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:08:13 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpl.nasa.gov; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=InSight1906; bh=rjfdE51+HDrO8+7hcFVngJSGU99WDmOB7oLbIKeq8wg=; b=PzxlSlJF/wwkEyU0UX4cmeV3mSv4VIBIKOJ2xM3q9V26IPPEBj61Tc1oGxYabfBija3/ 35h4UCKmUx4MLo1BmGotsZcVbNyKiP4TD9g0R4wtw337pM7JprKGMcSlQvj4JpfdMEH9 qHAoZUZ7Sm744Y/2RGLNP9MM/MNYWbjWmsAqCysFIqMDnekLZg0laot9VjAvKMev5m4o 0sJVof7cyd1/DJ+ji7dCvqrYU59oYm3zRAvoEoZUn2lXOWGZWMHYBXOZSlOwgoP+loA9 thpEoYnvnzuQcYRCaeLJh0UyjXgfQzX/VWDRSYJPU8dYYughUqlXubvNkIcqXLBP3NKt yA==
Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altphysenclup01.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.52]) by ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov with ESMTP id 2v37mt3k91-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:08:13 -0700
Received: from ap-embx16-sp50.RES.AD.JPL (ap-embx16-sp50.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.140]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id x8IK8CK1007176 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128 bits) verified FAIL); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:08:13 -0700
Received: from ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL (2002:8095:8953::8095:8953) by ap-embx16-sp50.RES.AD.JPL (2002:8095:898c::8095:898c) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:08:12 -0700
Received: from ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL ([fe80::4:f430:47b5:767b]) by ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL ([fe80::4:f430:47b5:767b%17]) with mapi id 15.01.1591.008; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:08:12 -0700
From: "Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B)" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>, DTN WG <dtn@ietf.org>
CC: "dtn-chairs@ietf.org" <dtn-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [EXTERNAL] [dtn] DTN WG updated charter milestones
Thread-Index: AQHVbltIp4MnNBYF/E+p4niL3Zw01acx3Gcw
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 20:08:12 +0000
Message-ID: <6de595010f554f5a9af9cecfa5aac563@jpl.nasa.gov>
References: <D38BFDA6-7F1D-4A10-830C-3CEC9B47DB3E@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <D38BFDA6-7F1D-4A10-830C-3CEC9B47DB3E@viagenie.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [207.151.104.72]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Source-IP: ap-embx16-sp50.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.140]
X-Source-Sender: scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov
X-AUTH: Authorized
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-09-18_09:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1909180171
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/3iKfEfMg9T5Nm7AZuxIy0IHnhAY>
Subject: Re: [dtn] [EXTERNAL] DTN WG updated charter milestones
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 20:08:17 -0000

I agree with these milestones for the next phase of DTN WG.  I wish that security key management could be included as well, but I recognize that we have got resource constraints.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: dtn <dtn-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Marc Blanchet
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 12:57 PM
To: DTN WG <dtn@ietf.org>
Cc: dtn-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [dtn] DTN WG updated charter milestones

Hello,
  following our discussion during the interim meeting today, I have grouped the agreed milestones as follows. This email is a call for comments on these milestones. Please show support or comment by friday sept 27th, so co-chairs get a good view of the working group. If agreed, then we will forward this to our AD for consideration.

Marc.

DTN WG Updated Charter Milestones

Bundle Protocol Additional Blocks
   Bundle-in-Bundle Encapsulation (D)
   Manifest block
Neighbor Discovery (X)
Naming and Addressing
   Naming (X)
   Addressing (X)
   Registry of Service Identifiers
Asynchronous Management
   AMA Application Data Model (ADM) (D)
   Asynchronous Management Protocol (D)
   Asynchronous Management Protocol Agent ADM (D)
   Various protocol components agent ADM (D) Security Key Management (D) Additional Convergence Layers (X)

Legend:
D an active or recent draft exists on this topic X RFCs or draft from dtnrg exists on this topic

_______________________________________________
dtn mailing list
dtn@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn