Re: [dtn] [EXTERNAL] DTN WG updated charter milestones

"Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B)" <> Wed, 18 September 2019 20:19 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4861208E5; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:19:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uh1NYCZDtGfw; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3947C120863; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd ( []) by ( with SMTP id x8IKFNqC193761; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:19:19 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=InSight1906; bh=1paplzOPt17PU6AYiwf+P5TI+e0yNk5vbYHaEPHGBVo=; b=FXkuRbt/i0jDrwvZ98ze+SRiDMbBKFWS1eQbKRKi9hSQ/jfQrz58md1hgV5AVqyb+ZDU wuQKdA0+OaiCkGKu+1W574m/PvNT+wqG6yWa1Ql7SUJbsdYZahAXFZvPnOgHka6gTdiY SbrppjRgPwgN/kaW+ymTMf4xT3zz0CgEDAgWJTrKD6cA8C1l2SFP77Kmx4ULotpT7dBG p8s4vEW30CprSr0KWUKKPu1c3nja6QA3yiZwLwAjBJIfocFyXt5kKBqGKBaNqCn3l9eS AgHErPDBf+jA2EtqbEg+iKKUCGHbdOQNIMBMnWs31UuFhXc7Do8Poxxcd7eQiP+cEunK zg==
Received: from ( []) by with ESMTP id 2v37mt3mrg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:19:19 -0700
Received: from ap-embx16-sp50.RES.AD.JPL ( []) by (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id x8IKJIZX028399 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128 bits) verified FAIL); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:19:18 -0700
Received: from ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL (2002:8095:8953::8095:8953) by ap-embx16-sp50.RES.AD.JPL (2002:8095:898c::8095:898c) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:19:18 -0700
Received: from ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL ([fe80::4:f430:47b5:767b]) by ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL ([fe80::4:f430:47b5:767b%17]) with mapi id 15.01.1591.008; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:19:18 -0700
From: "Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B)" <>
To: Mehmet Adalier <>, "Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B)" <>, Marc Blanchet <>, DTN WG <>
CC: "" <>
Thread-Topic: [dtn] [EXTERNAL] DTN WG updated charter milestones
Thread-Index: AQHVbl2y6sIMkd6WuUy5JiyGbacn7acx30bw
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 20:19:18 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Source-IP: []
X-AUTH: Authorized
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-09-18_09:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1909180173
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [dtn] [EXTERNAL] DTN WG updated charter milestones
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 20:19:28 -0000

Ah, of course - sorry I missed that.  Maybe some carriage returns got lost in those last 3 lines.

-----Original Message-----
From: dtn <> On Behalf Of Mehmet Adalier
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 1:15 PM
To: Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B) <>rg>; Marc Blanchet <>ca>; DTN WG <>
Subject: Re: [dtn] [EXTERNAL] DTN WG updated charter milestones

Looks like security key management got included towards the bottom. But it was formatted on the same line as ADM.

I'd like security key management to be a higher priority, and I am willing to actively participate to get it done.


On 9/18/19, 1:08 PM, "dtn on behalf of Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B)" < on behalf of> wrote:

    I agree with these milestones for the next phase of DTN WG.  I wish that security key management could be included as well, but I recognize that we have got resource constraints.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: dtn <> On Behalf Of Marc Blanchet
    Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 12:57 PM
    To: DTN WG <>
    Subject: [EXTERNAL] [dtn] DTN WG updated charter milestones
      following our discussion during the interim meeting today, I have grouped the agreed milestones as follows. This email is a call for comments on these milestones. Please show support or comment by friday sept 27th, so co-chairs get a good view of the working group. If agreed, then we will forward this to our AD for consideration.
    DTN WG Updated Charter Milestones
    Bundle Protocol Additional Blocks
       Bundle-in-Bundle Encapsulation (D)
       Manifest block
    Neighbor Discovery (X)
    Naming and Addressing
       Naming (X)
       Addressing (X)
       Registry of Service Identifiers
    Asynchronous Management
       AMA Application Data Model (ADM) (D)
       Asynchronous Management Protocol (D)
       Asynchronous Management Protocol Agent ADM (D)
       Various protocol components agent ADM (D) Security Key Management (D) Additional Convergence Layers (X)
    D an active or recent draft exists on this topic X RFCs or draft from dtnrg exists on this topic
    dtn mailing list
    dtn mailing list

dtn mailing list