IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dtn] BPbis - time units

"Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B)" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov> Wed, 29 July 2020 01:09 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E343A0DF1 for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:09:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FROM_GOV_DKIM_AU=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jpl.nasa.gov
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XGjmxouZ64lQ for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov (ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29E7E3A0DF6 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1]) by ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 06T152S8007990 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:09:06 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpl.nasa.gov; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : mime-version; s=InSight1906; bh=/dfa2eMUMB2Sw76gidoHvTOrUplPNBZjwyspmjNIgWg=; b=Q2l9BQ88cS+2KeddzLeIxU8jm8gAcd/nZyrSJGStwO4gKWbQH5cBMQmm5FCGAdwtdsD5 k9+3cOit569A9nS/i2CpCt5AGUSlans6HvUvQMj8R9JK+Vn1FX0qy/koZN3rIRMpGfRo 70ZC7xgFf9V82L/ZrRmSFbuzp5oLUtjNboV+CqQ/NoLZNZ5j2WQVU50V9ZonMkM6nPC+ gnaU55YFHtQbnWvXYUEwOg5hWuizuqQ6A/P6/RBYbdTISD3IBhXNs/tozhBuCixdDCdi kGIhwN+WikE/vhFHyZXH4M5Bx63z5pKWelH3ABA0qUJ1xgDlhmzQzv05VW4xIRp1+UHX 7Q==
Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altphysenclup03.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.120]) by ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov with ESMTP id 32ghu82gw1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <dtn@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:09:06 -0700
Received: from ap-embx16-sp20.RES.AD.JPL (ap-embx16-sp20.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.84]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id 06T195Qh016067 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128 bits) verified FAIL) for <dtn@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:09:06 -0700
Received: from ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL (2002:8095:8953::8095:8953) by ap-embx16-sp20.RES.AD.JPL (2002:8095:8954::8095:8954) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:09:05 -0700
Received: from ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL ([fe80::4:f430:47b5:767b]) by ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL ([fe80::4:f430:47b5:767b%17]) with mapi id 15.01.1979.003; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:09:05 -0700
From: "Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B)" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
To: "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: BPbis - time units
Thread-Index: AdZlRE16z8ydhrAuQoeEqKCZTB9oag==
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 01:09:05 +0000
Message-ID: <9f0460a88aab4e29bc0d12347b27613a@jpl.nasa.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [207.151.104.72]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9f0460a88aab4e29bc0d12347b27613ajplnasagov_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Source-IP: ap-embx16-sp20.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.84]
X-Source-Sender: scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov
X-AUTH: Authorized
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-29_01:2020-07-28, 2020-07-28 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=661 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2006250000 definitions=main-2007290005
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/PLYl_bwixjjepOjgEPL6tvfe3rE>
Subject: [dtn] BPbis - time units
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 01:09:08 -0000

Hi.  At IETF-108 there was discussion on whether BP time fields (e.g., bundle creation time, lifetime, bundle age) should be denominated in seconds, milliseconds, microseconds, or nanoseconds.  Version 26 of the BPbis I-D (now posted) revises all time field definitions to be denominated in milliseconds.  Is this the best way forward?  It would be helpful to discover the WG consensus on this matter.

Please use this thread for your comments.

Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email