IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dtn] BPbis - BPSec requirement

Rick Taylor <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com> Mon, 27 July 2020 13:05 UTC

Return-Path: <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9933A1958 for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 06:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vYDE5HtSb9va for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 06:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tropicalstormsoftware.com (mail.tropicalstormsoftware.com [188.94.42.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D3A53A1871 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 06:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tss-server1.home.tropicalstormsoftware.com ([fe80::48e4:acbb:6065:8168]) by tss-server1.home.tropicalstormsoftware.com ([fe80::48e4:acbb:6065:8168%16]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 14:05:35 +0100
From: Rick Taylor <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
To: "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: BPbis - BPSec requirement
Thread-Index: AdZkCmA3UPp4cISXQ0W3R8JTCdlwYw==
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 13:05:34 +0000
Message-ID: <38A5475DE83986499AEACD2CFAFC3F9801F585E9E8@tss-server1.home.tropicalstormsoftware.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [2a02:1648:4000:120:7d32:c34a:6930:e9fd]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_38A5475DE83986499AEACD2CFAFC3F9801F585E9E8tssserver1hom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/Q5gvR0FEDUYyCTSfRGwu4I88R6Y>
Subject: [dtn] BPbis - BPSec requirement
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 13:05:40 -0000

All,

At IETF-108 there was discussion on whether BPbis should require BPSec, and the chairs are interested in discovering the WG consensus on this matter.

Please use this thread for your comments.

Cheers,

Rick & Marc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email