IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn] BPbis - BPSec requirement

"Wiethuechter, Adam" <adam.wiethuechter@axenterprize.com> Mon, 03 August 2020 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <adam.wiethuechter@axenterprize.com>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 564F63A1075 for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 12:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=axenterprize.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CjLzmawY3xWU for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 12:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2e.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD7293A1072 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 12:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2e.google.com with SMTP id 1so15154497vsl.1 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 12:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=axenterprize.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=96CdbEzXHgyfiNzbJ4P2AJCbrw2dI9BRWOpF9zAMG4Y=; b=rW60I5SXbR3LW6B/9x5NEOC6r04gRgGsyf3F1wGLijxrwTRHylGSGJkhwMxy/35pIM 43e5qhisfANDWLSnYNW8NY9TgV1oG1eB1yDa5Uaj/b5Qf0nmg85butpVJbs41wTTq06U lDHfeqjGVP9bIGamZafLDXDqY5ZPW+9RIRbA8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=96CdbEzXHgyfiNzbJ4P2AJCbrw2dI9BRWOpF9zAMG4Y=; b=jinpoHbFvuzehODhDC8JL9Vtp1mn1eJOIiL7kh5zj9QAPkrXagUaze+9Oze8YdMdzF jjm/lJy0o2cSK+pd9BlcIuVkcu9om+5Evw7Au/mgw90Ldld1QPwSb6WJ0itFmF2fbwU8 LN/OkJTXte70JdffuNtDmOkLQqbfmZWHIzlsARVfmwdt5c+v/80zbDoZqqpf2YeJc35V nTmJuRSnDDv/L6FlUOltS63M7glzw0pr+Fyiub9O//DgTFFSiQ+txJFS3Zq4c4kPlfBG TVH7efHYPTCpQEyQziqYXKlZNfbhYSfFnBglRC7RvW2CT5kNXUP9WokYiDxyU1ioB2aW Ae+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531YKquWDZCer7Hw18R8MTvjHVfrdtxGMpSBOl5yjEn+BibOufCk MemdFb27HjMN1Derrwdnp4AwTIOW6mM713rDSBQqIy8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwldNm8CSm9otk/r8QJuAbu2WKnFJ3zSQxE0pGgVn+9mDqVQsGzDVnj/feBRMGiOBp11fjUgWvm1m1JvuXIyT8=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:8750:: with SMTP id j77mr13061815vsd.5.1596482077409; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 12:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <38A5475DE83986499AEACD2CFAFC3F9801F585E9E8@tss-server1.home.tropicalstormsoftware.com> <MN2PR13MB3567A3CF5746A6B6B88392229F720@MN2PR13MB3567.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <4911668186a1b454e02cad36f061bd8882c65ccb.camel@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4911668186a1b454e02cad36f061bd8882c65ccb.camel@gmail.com>
From: "Wiethuechter, Adam" <adam.wiethuechter@axenterprize.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 15:14:26 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+r8TqVGDBkQJtnNptQc_MXh49SY6i=5o7+b6wZqP0+haHh1eA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001d625e05abfdf3cd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/XhJCAlzKM9Gg-MhhK7RRFpBraXk>
Subject: Re: [dtn] BPbis - BPSec requirement
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 19:14:40 -0000

I also agree with Brian.

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 6:16 PM <ronnybull@gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree 100% with Brian.  BPSec should be the "standard" for bundle-
> level encryption.
>
> Ronny
>
> On Tue, 2020-07-28 at 11:52 +0000, Brian Sipos wrote:
> > All,
> > My opinion is that BPSec should be required in the sense of: When
> > bundle-level security is needed, you must use BPSec instead of some
> > other mechanism with the same or similar scope.
> > This is the same type of qualified requirement used for TLS in
> > TCPCLv4.
> > This requirement steers implementations away from private
> > encodings/behaviors, which is desirable as Rick mentioned in the
> > Monday meeting.
> >
> > From: dtn <dtn-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Rick Taylor <
> > rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
> > Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 09:05
> > To: dtn@ietf.org <dtn@ietf.org>
> > Subject: [dtn] BPbis - BPSec requirement
> >
> > All,
> >
> > At IETF-108 there was discussion on whether BPbis should require
> > BPSec, and the chairs are interested in discovering the WG consensus
> > on this matter.
> >
> > Please use this thread for your comments.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Rick & Marc
> > _______________________________________________
> > dtn mailing list
> > dtn@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn
>
> _______________________________________________
> dtn mailing list
> dtn@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn
>


-- 
73's,
Adam T. Wiethuechter
AX Enterprize, LLC

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email