[dtn] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9171 (7881)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 03 April 2024 18:00 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F4CC15153F; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 11:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tQcq3YX99BTe; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 11:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D212AC14F705; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 11:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 9E00E4C290; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 11:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
To: sburleig.sb@gmail.com, kfall+rcs@kfall.com, edward.birrane@jhuapl.edu, dtn-ads@ietf.org, edward.birrane@jhuapl.edu, rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: jh571912@ohio.edu, dtn@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240403180031.9E00E4C290@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 11:00:31 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/ortmSAm0k0-hFvO7Goyd1DzWYCQ>
Subject: [dtn] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9171 (7881)
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 18:00:35 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9171, "Bundle Protocol Version 7". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7881 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: John Huff <jh571912@ohio.edu> Section: 6.1.1 Original Text ------------- The first element of each bundle status item SHALL be a status indicator, a Boolean value indicating whether or not the corresponding bundle status is asserted, encoded as a CBOR Boolean value. Corrected Text -------------- The first element of each bundle status item SHALL be a status indicator, a Boolean value indicating whether or not the corresponding bundle status is asserted, encoded as a CBOR simple value. A value of 'true' SHALL be encoded as a CBOR simple value with additional information 21. A value of 'false' SHALL be encoded as a CBOR simple value with additional information 20. Notes ----- The CBOR spec does not define a 'Boolean' type (RFC8949). It's become common practice to encode boolean values as simple values (major type 7), with additional information 21 indicating 'true' and additional information 20 indicating 'false' (RFC9254, RFC8152). However, this should be explicitly stated for clarity. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC9171 (draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis-31) -------------------------------------- Title : Bundle Protocol Version 7 Publication Date : January 2022 Author(s) : S. Burleigh, K. Fall, E. Birrane, III Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [dtn] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9171 (7881) RFC Errata System
- Re: [dtn] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9171 (78… Keith Scott