IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9171 (7881)

Keith Scott <keithlscott@gmail.com> Wed, 03 April 2024 21:32 UTC

Return-Path: <keithlscott@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C19FC14F5F7; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:32:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FWl1KgTv6sQJ; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x431.google.com (mail-pf1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2A0AC14F5FC; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x431.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6e6ee9e3cffso210661b3a.1; Wed, 03 Apr 2024 14:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712179949; x=1712784749; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=UQPwgXIClENmoxsJyX1sNH54iGSIqLaSm98TZBm0fU0=; b=SWbcZvZ3eb41X4WVxXfx8abvLXUWeOphoRtQTcg9boZKNcGXN30C8BPyXvUPEHGiu0 eXya4iwBNHArLNoptr+kAQpdKsCx/U9lqGJDX72CjPgYSfKoODKsXoEGU5NmZOOHQNet J/+1ReD01nxcsArn7kacIMxvS7QHDZ3/alJ0uwQJccyxq7du6YlHZHxt0UxIr4X4VKSN 49QiKbk9JdDRTdGqOdC/AxZXgKdB5SWMqWICB0SqLwjJlNta/8L3SpGAVugCY3vvkFSY ggEBbx0/Hx2rfrO23Wo7HK8iacM2yxMRl7HAe6tXAPtkQuYFQO1/cSIDjBYkpD1c45E7 JAMA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712179949; x=1712784749; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=UQPwgXIClENmoxsJyX1sNH54iGSIqLaSm98TZBm0fU0=; b=RluB76Bieb79+fF7v6eGt6B0S7JYCUwiJXeSPGm8U1gCJiFq250HF6zwW99LntuCgt 9Icx11AU9QT0zZCVYiLmK7qDtvEED+PHXOTg+3GDRbwU5jkbujnuppXnXzMIl6jxJmAb SxzL4TLZOXOq7ZyPO5gh6rugqimeSMopvCwbr/5vY5BfB7G/mkpKr6g8s5gqEkUW6Pp9 MsIE6V3UIHjLFOcsovP0Ukse51QJ7ubfIKkbtvm34dN7JzB9PARfw7ZTYmIBSA3JuPpv EhGf8EGuj/HkvF5/5MPSrgHSgGGstjgEgyMhw8NNaU+RoT8iu38Bp+eHEC5t+tqIYD3b mdYg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXiIos4j1ZyYbx/spaJTmEhW1oZcdfHRV4BiDBR7n3ZA7TRdLCZH+S6pCQ58kIzjgkIQzUFzisisyKscUKScZvHnfRoiOzNCya1vxdi1o4=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YydZP9gGppeXRqQzPbndb6mUGozkDVFXpuUMuqeCmZjzaVYSx30 EFZCjgfLDhmi+yjX0oXrgg3VORdQwDk3gjP914ehediLLXYzg08QXXXYQm/AHVmfy7GbL8EScDp 7/jSvCU2fQQVU3WZlMay1EuhRnuY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHVa7snGr0lfHxfSnFW7UHBClbB4xTrl3XRwkQkr+wD0MDxDM4bonNAQtjqSC6wSD02ldiB4VpHJdC5HqSkIaU=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9f5d:0:b0:6e7:e64:2ad8 with SMTP id h29-20020aa79f5d000000b006e70e642ad8mr4153075pfr.8.1712179948670; Wed, 03 Apr 2024 14:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240403180031.9E00E4C290@rfcpa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240403180031.9E00E4C290@rfcpa.amsl.com>
From: Keith Scott <keithlscott@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 23:32:17 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHdkBBkRd6f5=+v942LVUCwQJ91q8id76Y7J5Wmqgi2wqr1oyQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: sburleig.sb@gmail.com, kfall+rcs@kfall.com, edward.birrane@jhuapl.edu, dtn-ads@ietf.org, rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com, jh571912@ohio.edu, dtn@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a1dd41061537f512"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/unhnonZvxLaldBZ3cyh2MK1-Rpk>
Subject: Re: [dtn] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9171 (7881)
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 21:32:37 -0000

This seems like a good clarification.

  --keith

On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 8:00 PM RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9171,
> "Bundle Protocol Version 7".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7881
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: John Huff <jh571912@ohio.edu>
>
> Section: 6.1.1
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>    The first element of each bundle status item SHALL be a status
>    indicator, a Boolean value indicating whether or not the
>    corresponding bundle status is asserted, encoded as a CBOR Boolean
>    value.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    The first element of each bundle status item SHALL be a status
>    indicator, a Boolean value indicating whether or not the
>    corresponding bundle status is asserted, encoded as a CBOR simple
>    value.  A value of 'true' SHALL be encoded as a CBOR simple value
>    with additional information 21.  A value of 'false' SHALL be encoded
>    as a CBOR simple value with additional information 20.
>
> Notes
> -----
> The CBOR spec does not define a 'Boolean' type (RFC8949). It's become
> common practice to encode boolean values as simple values (major type 7),
> with additional information 21 indicating 'true' and additional information
> 20 indicating 'false' (RFC9254, RFC8152). However, this should be
> explicitly stated for clarity.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9171 (draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis-31)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Bundle Protocol Version 7
> Publication Date    : January 2022
> Author(s)           : S. Burleigh, K. Fall, E. Birrane, III
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
> _______________________________________________
> dtn mailing list
> dtn@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email