IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn] DTN addressing, routing, and ownership

"R. Atkinson" <rja.lists@gmail.com> Wed, 01 July 2020 15:22 UTC

Return-Path: <rja.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B9C3A0F50 for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E5AdDGBgqU4s for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72b.google.com (mail-qk1-x72b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65EBC3A0F53 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72b.google.com with SMTP id e11so22552808qkm.3 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 08:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=e7qsW7eIaY4uVQwjcN//q01NLNwmsUDsMXuajExDE2U=; b=veNUjzbcJUuwcMAHCyScDPwqCACBkNRzKNiRTwzPJ9b7f/KfcLYT50UuBLMBpJCcYP z3k2Vu6ep/BVoGX1RoYEdbq3LSAlXJxXF75RN91GCOJRoDePGnakCbfGEcDYnqPwWEjw mvEqLwTkUmlYgKg+vJs/CxCwW1kC4qpwdDYCriWpGLEmdHnRVGOHKZqPuel199fgQwve u+q1mZdZhv9EjXOkL/JwOh2vjfLbFDq2BQkHZC2++91nW4ZWUp8GI96n/NyQBQPRAKvE 7uhgHJLzFiB9O0vblDWQU1dzXrAwYKRiAwUYnRvZ6HW+dkbaY4D68XqQ3MltU+HDhXsx UDFw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=e7qsW7eIaY4uVQwjcN//q01NLNwmsUDsMXuajExDE2U=; b=Hy3Wfu3GbUBntaRckgvgKtb+HTbZ3SQcv16fQVitYF0SyDOx5yoRw+mVf+bKdJBv+K VgvIk+k1akWXQ9zw16d5Pycp7FpxlNLHWnLJdhSJLD32FvW3hkjrlD+JpM6h0eMHge2g Tl4C8hNrihKgne3UBnh4cr2v3YrE7kBn6MUBrQmRgVhpQcU+v10Cv9jV5mplsz1fhY/o 22fTEPdNBxC6dlP2QUJwHcA+h5630tXhzVriZwpTY0cSQfdmsBu8AQM4v0uskpe/lPLq futrE8R0si6mrJSGO25/65CcUxEgzXaAvF/+iEIKONCUexb9M3bD6QggwH30lCJVGmLd oiRg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531HzqRzD7x1uhLI3r11VTT6G5HD2ag/gnKUyXzy3tqkhoWHkfFP FBC+7dOcvXpBSmOTH9elL9C4XMGg
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxrywjHdvcd+FrgaMzMMLdEoTQF9sOxlrnMo6RWWz9ZlNiB2n7WGZtgzmyQpy+Cea/iCpMxCg==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:6792:: with SMTP id b140mr24001538qkc.405.1593616919259; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 08:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.20.27] (pool-141-156-180-77.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [141.156.180.77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m20sm5127084qkk.104.2020.07.01.08.21.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Jul 2020 08:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
From: "R. Atkinson" <rja.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6990ef88820a400f8c3be2c33310c5f6@jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 11:21:57 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <632DB9EE-0340-487D-A741-A90713290C01@gmail.com>
References: <MN2PR13MB356748622EBD29B0028737E19F910@MN2PR13MB3567.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <095534b510e44eeebe2d02865eafd10d@jpl.nasa.gov> <MN2PR13MB3567754EE9D8D3C7D19DBD259F6F0@MN2PR13MB3567.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <631c36b735934d7eb0df5873536b6ee4@jpl.nasa.gov> <MN2PR13MB35671B6724A93836F3F94F2C9F6F0@MN2PR13MB3567.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <6990ef88820a400f8c3be2c33310c5f6@jpl.nasa.gov>
To: DTN WG <dtn@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/rh5-cAInh6T4aYfarET3-xCNRPI>
Subject: Re: [dtn] DTN addressing, routing, and ownership
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 15:22:02 -0000


> On Jun 30, 2020, at 19:35, Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B) <scott.c.burleigh=40jpl.nasa.gov@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> I completely agree, Brian, we need to do a better job of documenting this.  It would also be good to document the corresponding semantics for the “dtn” scheme; that may actually be written down somewhere, but I can’t lay my hands on it right now.

I agree that this discussion has been illuminating, both where folks seem to agree and particularly where the vagueness might be deliberate to preserve options.  

It would be good to have these thoughts documented somewhere.  For now, maybe it could be “Informational” status just to document both what is widely agreed upon and also maybe document the known alternatives in cases where multiple perspectives or options might exist ?

Maybe someone should create an Internet-Draft ? 

Thanks,

Ran

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email