Re: [Dyncast] CAN BoF issues and the next steps

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Wed, 13 April 2022 06:19 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dyncast@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dyncast@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA283A1A3D for <dyncast@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 23:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.512
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.512 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wSV8h4nOuEru for <dyncast@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 23:19:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2E893A1A3B for <dyncast@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 23:19:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id c12-20020a17090a020c00b001cba1ebb20cso3624909pjc.0 for <dyncast@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 23:19:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id :references:to; bh=25O8C2Ml+ud4qNsYH2kisjZ0yq6csiEDypBpuLmyV98=; b=f8FnofZ6WCNC+hgvjjxOCV3FqJdJ1G6kiu0c6SkznZFYvH6R+7nCmh9BPTYZK0Ha0K 6Dei1iVnvCLJHT73RKRuNF+lN6knY9R+hjGopWRGtGuC+g4Eux8+TW0A1SMFi6VHvEVp t7v24cGGkcH5O8lfbcPFZCHJJZT0yy1PWRn6Cp6kvDAyYlBLh+7j49xza+doDgaUKylU /GZz2DW0OMkpYdn+M6WSvS3TovXRlSQnXQYdet8sEydJcBiOqpDZRQdFnNoIXGu9x1FU Ce2M0/QauxSTURa9wuo0aToTXgSIurjxQOwzIzTFcCaXoHCWIzjttKsnRLaJG9xExcHe UE/Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=25O8C2Ml+ud4qNsYH2kisjZ0yq6csiEDypBpuLmyV98=; b=TAJ720OteDH1AxQ/0u7+BT05rd6D0jfZ+5ZFWRt6vm638N9jrlADJOvm6IIF6fNNzg d/EUNWTFu/tKLbIiqXfba6SLnLf5wPy08U5rrpgctV3qbaDDUWD+MhOQUwf1ZwdJM/pJ W7qFTOTyQDOGYjpv8tapK8YNYBnUQ1rUAIwzt9K/SDTZcwDfWo8OLZMplU2YZE4m1vgx Nh5X7jxjKS3qD3xr/VaCwKXvBHmpUoraPtQ0meNXM7J5jN9wKxIJxsTIfyQtm6bikPBY e3uTkPAnoympjxcExOYSilJr9Dcbc5kuD3XYHE0EF0lGcQVhp8y1ipmEJMo8EI3MddPc klpQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532wNfuMBsdZzy7g6dmcaldeyc0Mkc8t/TC5mBeho480pPkE4dn9 sn4WiBbrei1C+1Jxtb/QvP8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyXDWhWg0j2EWA3EjZ66M18EucRKBA3yrShBo7IopxwSB+00flsr1q0h39zr1ad1s2h4IrDtA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:31cd:b0:158:542b:908d with SMTP id v13-20020a17090331cd00b00158542b908dmr15568635ple.16.1649830766288; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 23:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-67-169-103-239.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.169.103.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a11-20020a056a000c8b00b004fade889fb3sm42547242pfv.18.2022.04.12.23.19.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Apr 2022 23:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EF353ABA-A854-494C-91B6-F583F4519162"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.60.0.1.1\))
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <20220413115929730791134@chinamobile.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 23:19:24 -0700
Cc: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>, dyncast <dyncast@ietf.org>, Luigi IANNONE <luigi.iannone=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Message-Id: <547FE283-6CDC-4C0C-B052-3C009D7BE75A@tony.li>
References: <2022041114360459722023@chinamobile.com> <29752325-4d93-271d-a0f1-e874575dca9b@joelhalpern.com> <2022041122304706741797@chinamobile.com> <5c189bc0-0569-e2f9-54b3-1bb41335ae21@joelhalpern.com> <008f01d84e13$8b5db8f0$a2192ad0$@tsinghua.org.cn> <d8fd1f2624b743698ed7b9ba390299f3@huawei.com> <00ed01d84ee1$859b5f70$90d21e50$@tsinghua.org.cn> <de849853-e073-5b61-dab8-b5a3dc33ed71@joelhalpern.com> <00ee01d84ee2$7b852b50$728f81f0$@tsinghua.org.cn> <E0FB105F-CF94-420F-B601-EE5C036E616D@tony.li> <20220413115929730791134@chinamobile.com>
To: liupengyjy@chinamobile.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.60.0.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dyncast/QJMJabKVKAHcxCoSRg6UP6qf3Tc>
Subject: Re: [Dyncast] CAN BoF issues and the next steps
X-BeenThere: dyncast@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Dynamic Anycast <dyncast.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dyncast>, <mailto:dyncast-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dyncast/>
List-Post: <mailto:dyncast@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dyncast-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dyncast>, <mailto:dyncast-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 06:19:29 -0000

Hi Peng,


> The method of UE to pick the instance from the broker is simple but thought to cause more messages and latency compared to the in-path solution, and need the broker to learn all the network status. 


If minimizing messaging and latency are design requirements, then that needs to be justified somehow.

Tony