IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [E-impact] Carbon aware routing

Hesham ElBakoury <helbakoury@gmail.com> Fri, 16 February 2024 18:03 UTC

Return-Path: <helbakoury@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: e-impact@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: e-impact@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0D7C14F5FE for <e-impact@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 10:03:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LkUrDiaUgWMw for <e-impact@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 10:02:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com (mail-pj1-x1034.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85AA6C14F5FC for <e-impact@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 10:02:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-290ec261a61so1531948a91.0 for <e-impact@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 10:02:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1708106534; x=1708711334; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=d/RghfLDrTQELxG9fD+/4DQbv92F7WUxfijc80fwkHY=; b=TR4rlKlosihoHf1MHWoGoDow95L8bCcdrPCP32Oxnw9yQpOSMXNN4sXgIkGtRsWby6 tc4ff6OBOZnHCzAKy4+lbv0Oy5bQYZSlHW474ZIv4Uk3l6rQdNzMf+z0xEjiKKBxAXlx PatHqma8VkHbTKhZZ0mTRN8YQiy75Wez8di7YKU39s2ru069sDor7CbAeme+EevEdROc 56744hXnlRupBG1kVPs/a9g36YuuJzXK+o4gUjGCr4Ub5qIXvYofYEo+rh1SzYb+r5iX xD2XOcS7mT477fWrTxchSRtF05xpeVyAzhiGkox0VRMonWG8BicL6GV6iWxNRxK+6VU7 13Bw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708106534; x=1708711334; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=d/RghfLDrTQELxG9fD+/4DQbv92F7WUxfijc80fwkHY=; b=A87DFLBW6nLQgJyOa00G0Wrr6xkqKPTXO3eRyDxDGhGw3/dpmQbg89GA4i3xiu7Wv4 iSJbVcQ4cV/6vVZTYJzl5gDuUuO9EWtmXcanxMiXi/nkd4sIv8p63gyzU2f/xpXtmGbQ wecUOyrqgZ0ZRSy17JWyxz1Wdk8Mnd32OqpibrS2Hv2dxmFI7iOlXJfSEPJ5NFUBT/3S in3XNsdS20oIx2RT/2/N/eMo7MC2lifuJNCSp6Kb5RBbJLWe3a1eBYSImns6pX6xsYg9 DeRRe7bDij0TbA7EpMkfD2v2af07F8gE7GImQLoZzSO0W9AZM64obJFNeHRI0bt4Qv4B Xjkw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx0qgbJZphbY+TCczEDe1Uacy1MU4zrxP3nZ3qneLF/bcOa4M9P WbMvUwfWkMD3mzccuJXuTeUfXMo0OM/WETmLLyUFLERzidH5w4ZwVZuMelRmLmWVN933glnu0co l2nU2HW4b4AzMIl1+3WgNwFcIjdGzldIq
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEy9eVKmCVPSpkP1pXhh2U7GkrjUKhN+R1Yq5+ThVDHjKLVItntroedxmBYy6UVVEQuBRigeHMjc2liCYZFi2Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:68e:b0:299:3e54:83f6 with SMTP id m14-20020a17090b068e00b002993e5483f6mr1654517pjz.7.1708106533777; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 10:02:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFvDQ9qTLR1EgD0gAHhwTUCGsTbUsMB0MG=Lfw1EGGXGtyfDWQ@mail.gmail.com> <Zc-iHjH1RsDjKSfj@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <Zc-iHjH1RsDjKSfj@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Hesham ElBakoury <helbakoury@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 10:02:01 -0800
Message-ID: <CAFvDQ9pAxmLFvMQviZCFmG=HtNDyZxawV+0pSecSkB84bt_Atg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: E-Impact IETF <e-impact@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002f3a0b0611838b6f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/e-impact/LC875ZwtpdRruDwDoJ96azOixKM>
Subject: Re: [E-impact] Carbon aware routing
X-BeenThere: e-impact@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Environmental impacts of the Internet <e-impact.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/e-impact>, <mailto:e-impact-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/e-impact/>
List-Post: <mailto:e-impact@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:e-impact-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e-impact>, <mailto:e-impact-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 18:03:02 -0000

Tvr is my preference as we discussed upon tvr inception. But I think in
today's meeting IRTF was mentioned as the venue for this discussion.

Hesham

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024, 9:57 AM Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:

> IRTF not sure, but IETF TVR:
>
> From charter:
>
> "Similarly, network traffic might be routed based on energy costs or
> expected user data volumes, which may vary predictably over time in
> networks prioritizing green computing and energy efficiency."
>
> Cheers
>     Toerless
>
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 09:49:03AM -0800, Hesham ElBakoury wrote:
> > We had good presentation today on carbon aware routing. More details on
> > carbon aware routing are provided in this paper:
> > https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3629165
> >
> > Which IRTF group is suitable to discuss this topic More?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Hesham
>
> > --
> > E-impact mailing list
> > E-impact@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e-impact
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status