IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [E-impact] side meeting #119: Power Metrics: concrete usage example

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@gmail.com> Wed, 27 March 2024 00:11 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: e-impact@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: e-impact@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D61C14CE44 for <e-impact@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yJEuSQIp4ecQ for <e-impact@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x434.google.com (mail-pf1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7CA5C14CF1C for <e-impact@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x434.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6e704078860so4522713b3a.0 for <e-impact@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1711498258; x=1712103058; darn=ietf.org; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TkZ+Xw6Ga7SYmMiszKUGPa0PNuHSdRFheQZI6eyaAbc=; b=gh0eyXUmYn7yIEgMtj6aJLNRuBShhWb14AGi+RdVYcNyJ0it4re71D2DwCgjHniEIg Q8bb3JOfDJHX56ne1PLqbelSymvqZwUEyvelXBZ4EulaAOQMgEPkjfM65+k9bSg6x7aY GRjIeYSCS1Z4zZlAHt05NJ/HPVWkb7Kj9y0cO6V2eWk99/laXqH9igRpS6p9AhdH4IVR rnOevMREf3P0xHg15+t3bnbWlAX78xl5SXgLgroSIeM/6lNYBvGb+g7EihVQTt+8NcNZ +zK0XGV+ri976CnWayV+Njol/MXb2XxMoIfQplW86gDXpgG6gEvjDfKN4jJ9iF9RMUQ0 iGJQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711498258; x=1712103058; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TkZ+Xw6Ga7SYmMiszKUGPa0PNuHSdRFheQZI6eyaAbc=; b=lDnmv1y3/a5jX0Ppa9bCRnfmfrqlYqq74SdiOJtkdtXMc3oqbmZZ6ymDbRaYphEVTT 53NLxEwzlpIOYFDcNIp0R02x4fShq9Xt2xVjrX9q1pSPsitl73w3VZetYv01doau7BFg Jv4oSTTawDy6me94Gj0Rl7njjJZTBm/5b+mJJiAPwqz9h6QjUvxbghrc1XJrI5ohnvja iSBwz752U/uhiGzu5PUxv7SGaY3DRvMxoVt3NW2IK6w0umzo1/9IFHME0EFD5eU0315H MPx20pH1MxbBEXVNBErSmGSLjXRjixTgjwoYSJxomiT37SHN2A+G5jY/yrjKKCnqgIg+ XMrg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwgG5N22cbnyQIcQRZBnC9YLsu6LeDD4eTXY/3iJ8BRv0zPnHm2 UgGOcSrzAWAC/G5NNzkUMaOD+/e4m01ZNq+4FhCewt4ELqduvwgUpD0WF1/4cdfglA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGN+CD0j/jS6dxdlbuadfFrXDE4G582UkGFQyT1cCpQdbPigi0LyCTmBgpZyu/gBCasT/bNVg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:399b:b0:6ea:ad09:fe84 with SMTP id fi27-20020a056a00399b00b006eaad09fe84mr3023866pfb.12.1711498257361; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (194-223-161-170.static.tpgi.com.au. [194.223.161.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z4-20020a626504000000b006eaad01817esm4142314pfb.105.2024.03.26.17.10.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:10:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <073AE854-9E21-428F-87D9-6D546CF74FC8@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F49639EB-FD75-45E6-B8BE-E05A3BF2807F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 10:10:42 +1000
In-Reply-To: <DM4PR11MB52778685A92225856D21BB16C5282@DM4PR11MB5277.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "e-impact@ietf.org" <e-impact@ietf.org>
To: "Marisol Palmero Amador (mpalmero)" <mpalmero=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <DM4PR11MB52778685A92225856D21BB16C5282@DM4PR11MB5277.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/e-impact/xbtwQORNJpR4FRI_qIOOMJrbs4E>
Subject: Re: [E-impact] side meeting #119: Power Metrics: concrete usage example
X-BeenThere: e-impact@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Environmental impacts of the Internet <e-impact.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/e-impact>, <mailto:e-impact-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/e-impact/>
List-Post: <mailto:e-impact@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:e-impact-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e-impact>, <mailto:e-impact-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 00:11:00 -0000

FYI - you may see this only now, and it is clearly late. The mail did go through to a number of direct recipients and the OPSAWG list, but not the e-impact list, basically because I did not process the moderation queue. I’m sorry. I will try to do that better in the future. Hopefully not too many of you missed the event due to this.

Jar

> Marisol Palmero Amador (mpalmero) <mpalmero=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> kirjoitti 16.3.2024 kello 3.30:
> 
> Dear all,
>  
> We have booked a side meeting in Brisbone,  IETF #119
> Thursday 9:00 am local time.
> Headline: Power Metrics: concrete usage example
>  
>  
> Please see the agenda that we are proposing:
>  
> •              Overview of ongoing sustainability work in IETF (everyone contributes)
> •              Brief presentation of sustainability insights/poweff updates, incl. look at a more concrete example
> •              Any other short updates?
> •              next steps? E.g. WG coordination/status, form a WG Design Team, call for a BOF?
>  
>  
> As we would like to leave time to discuss and review **next steps**, for the overview we propose not more than 20 min.
> As authors from specific drafts, please let me know which draft(s) you would like to review, we would like to make sure that we could fit them into the 20 min
>  
> Safe travels, and have a nice weekend
>  
> Marisol Palmero, on behalf of the authors of sustainability insights& poweff drafts
>  
> -- 
> E-impact mailing list
> E-impact@ietf.org <mailto:E-impact@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e-impact

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email