IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ecrit] Discussion on draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-04

James Winterbottom <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com> Mon, 28 July 2014 22:12 UTC

Return-Path: <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188051A01E6 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ega71lmy2pcE for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com (mail-pa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 955021A0080 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id fa1so11343595pad.27 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=PAJjNLcG29YvEoWrl13EkoJtbw9s56sqzKpMt/2Mekw=; b=giZQlZrSBnGTUJAr55scgYpjnqaqSF1Yi0vmVjaIxKMSKZ8D9JCsE+oppzznp2gexO csb4FHVTZDoyHbJKWWv6YkZS/nAnhljBff3pGA5wX7vmU3Xc1f8rSU3Dpm90ApLWVB5c X3G3Ma+bkQyTcSo/8KuvXD7kcPbNGhjRsfArKN3pZrPh1E3a5VU+Xhtmy0ZH4TIurTSc Vdzs8OQSZOhj5rbq93ZQoROW/9CcPxUpiPH0FPq/g2Am/dXajH4QAhiOg1CkCnxmf8PO PgjmN86YAOlm1Y8O8lTrgHVLtPwYOb4P/HObVlP608zBU+06OZU9SKr0c8FfqHOy9aSe 0f2Q==
X-Received: by 10.70.27.161 with SMTP id u1mr1075077pdg.6.1406585515276; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (124-168-198-48.dyn.iinet.net.au. [124.168.198.48]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gu4sm18712359pbb.54.2014.07.28.15.11.53 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
References: <05074C92-4D02-48A6-83CC-C85CCB6ACADA@gmail.com> <96EF8E43-7039-4ADC-AB5B-1289EDD6F32C@neustar.biz> <4E9B21E8-ECBB-4AAB-98F1-62BA4DE8E601@gmail.com> <CFFC2D5B.5D570%mlinsner@cisco.com> <D9D4CBB9-6488-4962-87AB-8783510955FF@gmail.com> <CFFC3440.5D59F%mlinsner@cisco.com> <AF8CFA44-3A05-4752-81A5-A24E452C1D65@gmail.com> <CFFC3BFD.5D5DD%mlinsner@cisco.com> <69BE9441-72BA-400E-9EB6-38D955A5F0EF@gmail.com> <CFFC3EE1.5D5EF%mlinsner@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <CFFC3EE1.5D5EF%mlinsner@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8D761DD2-F3D2-4B50-8797-D3FDABF7DE80@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11D201)
From: James Winterbottom <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 08:11:51 +1000
To: "Marc Linsner (mlinsner)" <mlinsner@cisco.com>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/24Kz3x1bkl-2pvaUMj5y2GcCyL4
Cc: "ecrit_ietf.org" <ecrit@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Discussion on draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-04
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 22:12:05 -0000

And you would advocate that many again and then add LoST recurs ion or redirect on top of it. Triple WOW!

Sent from my iPhone

> On 29 Jul 2014, at 7:57 am, "Marc Linsner (mlinsner)" <mlinsner@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> James,
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Winterbottom <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com>
> Date: Monday, July 28, 2014 at 5:51 PM
> To: Marc Linsner <mlinsner@cisco.com>
> Cc: "ecrit_ietf.org" <ecrit@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Discussion on draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-04
> 
>> Hardly time critical!
> 
> My only response to this is WOW!
> 
> And you¹re advocating how many DNS queries to discover the ANP LS????
> 
> At least 3, mostly likely 4 or 5.
> 
> -Marc-
> 
> 
>> 
>> On 29 Jul 2014, at 7:49 am, Marc Linsner (mlinsner) <mlinsner@cisco.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: James Winterbottom <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Monday, July 28, 2014 at 5:39 PM
>>> To: Marc Linsner <mlinsner@cisco.com>
>>> Cc: "ecrit_ietf.org" <ecrit@ietf.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Discussion on draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-04
>>> 
>>>> I don¹t think that I said it had to come form the ANP, I think I said
>>>> that it can.
>>>> When it can, why do two queries?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> For the same reason a DNS query for www.foo.bar doesn¹t automagically
>>> give
>>> you foobar's webpage.  Two functions, two different responsibilities.
>>> 
>>> -Marc-
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers
>>>> James
> 
> 
> Š.snipŠ.
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email