IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ecrit] Objet : Status on draft-ietf-ecrit-similar-location-19

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Mon, 15 May 2023 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EFF0C1BE872 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 May 2023 09:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OS9UgU9iCnf2 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 May 2023 09:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x529.google.com (mail-ed1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::529]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69120C1BE86B for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 May 2023 09:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x529.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-50c079eb705so3241778a12.1 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 May 2023 09:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1684169685; x=1686761685; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bIg5aXR19SFsSVuE9maEgFdRzsngGsOycok6EBxOM3c=; b=Xc4DJyFNyC7TTdq9fH0EQIfop4jDK/Ucyozo1wGi76G5oH0z7W05tZ4+BS0dE34esF EpKK9a8c0Aywv9qNwPNourKk8/0ogC0vFseL5bc9V6rKQW6kNhM7PUB0mQ0N6YxPsZmk GgTERBilSyHGHofkjQ+NaiTQeqYkwv7FlhAOHX5Z6gD9nBQicYBagIg5do5hAz6Oi5o8 le1WMJEwEGC18zeEZk0xwvFbngL6Bdpj7VS88BrDWC6+z7b4Kv+oAEP9dPjUfjzBtEBa qISCLkWnV+fFwyL9J70w6Y2IXO4iTeRcR/183cluhiP4iu9WcDNXcwcH+FLsZYyQnxDk hQqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1684169685; x=1686761685; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=bIg5aXR19SFsSVuE9maEgFdRzsngGsOycok6EBxOM3c=; b=CN/8Hcv8/LFY7OgAofPaoKot+L0OuE9rS5z1zP5AOpVpPIZqHKIlqaQ6iJ9SNVgIEw LkTHGhfIWR8pWagJDqAHHELDBcuZ8Besaa7d6m1q4E0OwRuh2ymUOzsi9X8uhIbnzpJD dYTBCcKFHof/mNgLLi3lDhpVWLpsUQb0tgjHMZ4cjR2NclBVxYbnPnMmH6nY3V0ffmme L5h3XmEbht7aTz2hx4JmTkMiojUG+jpIPBdwJuSBc+l8p98PLpiTM5+slSZwX+cgQcrS twaLuUShOiNxvG+X0GaefLdbI7Fe+hujZXq1MT/kXWXBttuZTbIjcqaqllXyVJ/j7Y/R hhOA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzSGYn0tsgUuHuH2822q3M4PuMpTIZXFoTJ3QqEkwedlnN6cdFv T8K3qkJSUccTTqRHZxVkJSf4HJCR1lPN14xqV8g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4EJLU0xxJ4pBBfTzrxvkuqHeWZ/Zeg6jkfiKVJyQ1Jfg5/ZYAjIasb0jKrzzk74PRv/Ya0mRTeFTSeIbyWVK4=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1051:b0:966:1f60:fd32 with SMTP id j17-20020a170906105100b009661f60fd32mr7471919ejj.6.1684169684330; Mon, 15 May 2023 09:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <722C48F2-731A-4E70-B0F4-57B872105E93@hxcore.ol> <075A137D-2C50-4280-900C-F6E005AABD88@brianrosen.net>
In-Reply-To: <075A137D-2C50-4280-900C-F6E005AABD88@brianrosen.net>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 09:54:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaoNEFRo7VM_P0T5ENa6Dpr+zSo5MKpYPgOukk5FRb4gA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>
Cc: Guy Caron <guycaron911@gmail.com>, ecrit@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c6ad3905fbbe4f72"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/6fZCD6KdmJ4Ag_RQlwCrdp5dEvc>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Objet : Status on draft-ietf-ecrit-similar-location-19
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 16:54:47 -0000

So can we finish planned-changes?

-MSK

On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 3:07 PM Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net> wrote:

> Making any changes would require pulling the document back to the work
> group, editing, and restarting work group last call, IETF last call, and
> the IESG review/telecast process.  Then it would go to the back of the RFC
> Editor queue.
>
> You would be better off beating me up to finish planned-changes
>
> Brian
>
> On Jan 31, 2023, at 1:33 PM, Guy Caron <guycaron911@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 
>
> Correct me if I’m wrong but it seems to me that similar-location leverages
> the extension point, which was defined by RFC 5222. None of the new
> elements defined in planned-changes are needed to support similar-location.
>
>
>
> The only linkage I can see is in section 6 of planned-changes that
> presents an alternative in XML schema to the RFC 5222 Relax NG one.
> However, there is nothing in that section that states normatively that it
> replaces the RFC 5222 Relax NG schema.
>
>
>
> So, to unlock similar-location, would it be possible to remove the
> reference to planned-changes altogether?
>
>
>
> Alternatively, the XML schema could be moved from planned-changes to
> similar-location and let planned-changes refer to the similar-location RFC,
> similar-location being much more advanced that planned-changes.
>
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> Guy
>
>
>
> *De : *Dwight Purtle <dwightpurtle@gmail.com>
> *Envoyé le :*12 janvier 2023 00:33
> *À : *Guy Caron <guycaron911@gmail.com>
> *Cc : *ecrit@ietf.org
> *Objet :*Re: [Ecrit] Status on draft-ietf-ecrit-similar-location-19
>
>
>
> ECRIT-Similar-Location contains a reference to LoST-Planned-Changes, which
> is not yet complete.  Thus the MISSREF.
>
>
>
> Dwight Purtle
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 11:00 AM Guy Caron <guycaron911@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What’s the status on this draft?
>
>
>
> There was an announcement on 7 March 2022 that the IESG approved the draft
> as a Proposed Standard, yet the draft seems stuck in the REF Editor queue
> with a MISSREF and that, for 309 days.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Guy
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email