Re: [Ecrit] Requesting IETF LC for phonebcp - Minor IM issue
"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Tue, 08 February 2011 23:17 UTC
Return-Path: <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2323A67A1 for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 15:17:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.54
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.54 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.059, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FrmYDMqVo7YX for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 15:17:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840FE3A6841 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 15:17:58 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-3.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com ([171.71.177.238]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Feb 2011 23:18:06 +0000
Received: from jmpolk-wxp01.cisco.com (rcdn-jmpolk-8716.cisco.com [10.99.80.23]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p18NI6oh029374; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 23:18:06 GMT
Message-Id: <201102082318.p18NI6oh029374@sj-core-5.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 17:18:05 -0600
To: Marc Linsner <mlinsner@cisco.com>, ecrit@ietf.org
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C977140D.20FC1%mlinsner@cisco.com>
References: <EA7AE8AE-1D62-4796-927E-B5A10723BF20@bbn.com> <C977140D.20FC1%mlinsner@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Requesting IETF LC for phonebcp - Minor IM issue
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 23:17:59 -0000
+ another At 02:39 PM 2/8/2011, Marc Linsner wrote: >+1 > >-----Original Message----- >From: "Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com> >Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 14:25:46 -0600 >To: Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net> >Cc: <ecrit@ietf.org> >Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Requesting IETF LC for phonebcp - Minor IM issue > > ><hat type="individual" /> > > > >(I saw this on the XMPP list first, so my extended reply is there. I > >just sent it, so can't provide a link yet.) > > > >I do not think we should add XMPP to phonebcp at this point. Even though > >XMPP for emergency services is a great idea, it would not be a trivial > >addition. Let's let phonebcp go to RFC and handle XMPP in an update. > > > >--Richard > > > > > > > > > >On Feb 8, 2011, at 9:14 AM, Brian Rosen wrote: > > > >> Yes, I agree. > >> > >> I'm certain we will have a rev due to LC comments, and I will fix the > >>text in that rev. > >> > >> concur with Bernard on xmpp. > >> > >> Brian > >> > >> On Feb 8, 2011, at 8:33 AM, Bernard Aboba wrote: > >> > >>> I agree with this comment -- both should be required in the PSAP, not > >>>the endpoint. > >>> > >>> On XMPP support for emergency services, that is probably something > >>> to bring to the XMPP WG (or the XSF). The question will remain open > >>> until there is documentation, either describing how it can be done, or > >>> explaining why it is not supported. Until then, phonebcp should > >>>probably > >>> remain silent. > >>> > >>> > >>> > Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 10:28:36 +0100 > >>> > From: gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se > >>> > To: ecrit@ietf.org > >>> > Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Requesting IETF LC for phonebcp - Minor IM issue > >>> > > >>> > I think I discussed a need for a minor change in September. > >>> > > >>> > It is in the Media chapter 14. > >>> > > >>> > This statement: > >>> > "ED-75 Endpoints supporting Instant Messaging (IM) MUST support both > >>> > [RFC3428] and [RFC4975]." > >>> > > >>> > It looks strange to require both IM protocols of the endpoint. > >>>Usually > >>> > they support one. The requirement would be suitable for a PSAP. > >>> > > >>> > So, the agreement was to change to: > >>> > > >>> > "ED-75 Endpoints supporting Instant Messaging (IM) MUST support > >>>either > >>> > [RFC3428] or [RFC4975]." > >>> > > >>> > ( maybe there is now even an interest to add XMPP to that list, or > >>>do we > >>> > then open for a heap of complications regarding addressing and > >>>location > >>> > information etc. ) > >>> > > >>> > I do not regard this to be a subtantial issue, so I did not want to > >>> > bother the ietf mail list with it. > >>> > > >>> > /Gunnar > >>> > > >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> > >> At 04:37 PM 2/7/2011, Robert Sparks wrote: > >>> > >>> All - > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> I've requested IETFLC for the phonebcp draft. There are still > >>>some outstanding questions/comments from John Elwell that should be > >>>treated as last call comments. > >>> > >>> Also, something needs to register the sos.*.test URNs. I think > >>>this document could do that. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> RjS > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> > >>> Ecrit mailing list > >>> > >>> Ecrit@ietf.org > >>> > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit > >>> > > _______________________________________________ > >>> > > Ecrit mailing list > >>> > > Ecrit@ietf.org > >>> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit > >>> > _______________________________________________ > >>> > Ecrit mailing list > >>> > Ecrit@ietf.org > >>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Ecrit mailing list > >>> Ecrit@ietf.org > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Ecrit mailing list > >> Ecrit@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Ecrit mailing list > >Ecrit@ietf.org > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit > > >_______________________________________________ >Ecrit mailing list >Ecrit@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
- [Ecrit] Requesting IETF LC for phonebcp Robert Sparks
- Re: [Ecrit] Requesting IETF LC for phonebcp James M. Polk
- Re: [Ecrit] Requesting IETF LC for phonebcp Robert Sparks
- Re: [Ecrit] Requesting IETF LC for phonebcp - Min… Gunnar Hellström
- Re: [Ecrit] Requesting IETF LC for phonebcp - Min… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Ecrit] Requesting IETF LC for phonebcp - Min… Brian Rosen
- Re: [Ecrit] Requesting IETF LC for phonebcp - Min… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Ecrit] Requesting IETF LC for phonebcp - Min… Richard L. Barnes
- Re: [Ecrit] Requesting IETF LC for phonebcp - Min… Marc Linsner
- Re: [Ecrit] Requesting IETF LC for phonebcp - Min… James M. Polk