Re: [Ecrit] Requesting IETF LC for phonebcp

Yes, I agree.

I'm certain we will have a rev due to LC comments, and I will fix the text in that rev.

concur with Bernard on xmpp.

Brian

On Feb 8, 2011, at 8:33 AM, Bernard Aboba wrote:

> I agree with this comment -- both should be required in the PSAP, not the endpoint. 
> 
> On XMPP support for emergency services, that is probably something
> to bring to the XMPP WG (or the XSF).  The question will remain open
> until there is documentation, either describing how it can be done, or
> explaining why it is not supported.  Until then, phonebcp should probably
> remain silent. 
> 
> 
> > Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 10:28:36 +0100
> > From: gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se
> > To: ecrit@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Requesting IETF LC for phonebcp - Minor IM issue
> > 
> > I think I discussed a need for a minor change in September.
> > 
> > It is in the Media chapter 14.
> > 
> > This statement:
> > "ED-75 Endpoints supporting Instant Messaging (IM) MUST support both 
> > [RFC3428] and [RFC4975]."
> > 
> > It looks strange to require both IM protocols of the endpoint. Usually 
> > they support one. The requirement would be suitable for a PSAP.
> > 
> > So, the agreement was to change to:
> > 
> > "ED-75 Endpoints supporting Instant Messaging (IM) MUST support either 
> > [RFC3428] or [RFC4975]."
> > 
> > ( maybe there is now even an interest to add XMPP to that list, or do we 
> > then open for a heap of complications regarding addressing and location 
> > information etc. )
> > 
> > I do not regard this to be a subtantial issue, so I did not want to 
> > bother the ietf mail list with it.
> > 
> > /Gunnar
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> At 04:37 PM 2/7/2011, Robert Sparks wrote:
> > >>> All -
> > >>>
> > >>> I've requested IETFLC for the phonebcp draft. There are still some outstanding questions/comments from John Elwell that should be treated as last call comments.
> > >>> Also, something needs to register the sos.*.test URNs. I think this document could do that.
> > >>>
> > >>> RjS
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Ecrit mailing list
> > >>> Ecrit@ietf.org
> > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Ecrit mailing list
> > > Ecrit@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ecrit mailing list
> > Ecrit@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit