[Ecrit] [IANA #623333] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6739 (3393)

"Pearl Liang via RT" <iana-matrix@iana.org> Fri, 26 October 2012 04:09 UTC

RT-Owner: pearl.liang
From: Pearl Liang via RT <iana-matrix@iana.org>
In-Reply-To: <20121025214500.5A14F72E038@rfc-editor.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-623333@icann.org> <20121025214500.5A14F72E038@rfc-editor.org>
Message-ID: <rt-3.8.8-17978-1351224522-1831.623333-7-0@icann.org>
Precedence: bulk
RT-Ticket: IANA #623333
Managed-by: RT 3.8.8 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
RT-Originator: pearl.liang@icann.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 04:08:43 +0000
Cc: marc.linsner@cisco.com, ecrit@ietf.org, hgs+ecrit@cs.columbia.edu, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Ecrit] [IANA #623333] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6739 (3393)
Reply-To: iana-matrix@iana.org

Hi Sandy,

Thank you for taking care of this. I believe that there is no action
required on my end.  Please let me know if there is any actions 
required from us.

Cheers,
~pearl

On Thu Oct 25 14:51:12 2012, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6739,
> "Synchronizing Service Boundaries and <mapping> Elements Based on the
> Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Protocol".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6739&eid=3393
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Pearl Liang <drafts-update-ref@iana.org>
> 
> Section: 10.3
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>    <p>See <a href="[URL of published RFC]">RFC 6739
> </a>.</p>
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    <p>See <a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6739.txt">RFC 6739
> </a>.</p>
> 
> Notes
> -----
> RFC Editor should have updated this text before publication.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6739 (draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-sync-18)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Synchronizing Service Boundaries and <mapping>
> Elements Based on the Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Protocol
> Publication Date    : October 2012
> Author(s)           : H. Schulzrinne, H. Tschofenig
> Category            : EXPERIMENTAL
> Source              : Emergency Context Resolution with Internet
> Technologies
> Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>

[Ecrit] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6739 (3393) RFC Errata System
[Ecrit] [IANA #623333] [Editorial Errata Reported… Pearl Liang via RT