[Ecrit] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6739 (3393)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 25 October 2012 21:50 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC1F21F8757 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.274
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.274 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.326, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N-IrrTmI3-xg for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96CE621F858F for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 5A14F72E038; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
To: hgs+ecrit@cs.columbia.edu, Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com, rjsparks@nostrum.com, marc.linsner@cisco.com, rmarshall@telecomsys.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20121025214500.5A14F72E038@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:45:00 -0700
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, ecrit@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Ecrit] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6739 (3393)
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:50:48 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6739, "Synchronizing Service Boundaries and <mapping> Elements Based on the Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Protocol". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6739&eid=3393 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Pearl Liang <drafts-update-ref@iana.org> Section: 10.3 Original Text ------------- <p>See <a href="[URL of published RFC]">RFC 6739 </a>.</p> Corrected Text -------------- <p>See <a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6739.txt">RFC 6739 </a>.</p> Notes ----- RFC Editor should have updated this text before publication. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6739 (draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-sync-18) -------------------------------------- Title : Synchronizing Service Boundaries and <mapping> Elements Based on the Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Protocol Publication Date : October 2012 Author(s) : H. Schulzrinne, H. Tschofenig Category : EXPERIMENTAL Source : Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Ecrit] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6739 (3393) RFC Errata System
- [Ecrit] [IANA #623333] [Editorial Errata Reported… Pearl Liang via RT