Re: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: Question on scope of the Contact URI, defined in section 3.1.5
Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Tue, 22 October 2013 15:45 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B030211E846A for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.623
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.623 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZwM9QAxOEfKN for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:45:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771D111E83E9 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.254.200] ([80.92.115.161]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MHso5-1Va0W10lDh-003eR4 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:45:00 +0200
Message-ID: <52669D95.8030501@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:45:25 +0200
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Roger Marshall <RMarshall@telecomsys.com>, 'Christer Holmberg' <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C41E812@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C422BC7@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>, <CAOPrzE3XQGhXgH_zPpNDeLBrPb4hRUp2JefV2s9TqW1Ku0=RSA@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C422DB7@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <FBD5AAFFD0978846BF6D3FAB4C892ACC3EDF01@SEA-EXMB-1.telecomsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <FBD5AAFFD0978846BF6D3FAB4C892ACC3EDF01@SEA-EXMB-1.telecomsys.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:uWdcfq7B3xV/5psNyH3PZ8GKPfEK9FpVEeIFzaucW9q3LvpZtij kP5I8RZUEOvCTTsw9jydXxQ1w0TGoVwhzlKuP1JyRt9bbjUCNxReNjCpFvADK09nt+pib8w /2CfBSFyVPTcxWtb6dB7QfeHakaq75MOPJ5wCR742HZQhgYrZ5Hcr1ixZNenQ61JlRLWP3f Xahf7W39loxZB3AMrHNJA==
Cc: "ecrit_ietf.org" <ecrit@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: Question on scope of the Contact URI, defined in section 3.1.5
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:45:07 -0000
Hi Christer, as discussed in this email thread I added text for clarification: ---- 3.1.5. Data Provider Contact URI Data Element: Data Provider Contact URI Use: Required XML Element: <ContactURI> Description: When provided by a service provider or an access provider, this information MUST be a URI to a 24/7 support organization tasked to provide PSAP support for this emergency call. If the call is from a device, this would reflect the contact information of the owner of the device. If a telephone number is the contact address then it MUST be tel URI. If it is provided as a SIP URI then it MUST be in the form of sip:telephonenumber@serviceprovider:user=phone. Note that this contact information is not used by PSAPs for callbacks using a SIP Priority header field with the value set to "psap- callback", as described in [I-D.ietf-ecrit-psap-callback]. ---- Do you think that I managed to capture your concern? Ciao Hannes On 08/26/2013 10:33 PM, Roger Marshall wrote: > I agree with Christer’s suggestion to add caution text. > > -roger. > > *From:*ecrit-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf > Of *Christer Holmberg > *Sent:* Thursday, August 08, 2013 9:44 PM > *To:* Brian Rosen > *Cc:* ecrit_ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: Question on > scope of the Contact URI, defined in section 3.1.5 > > Hi, > > If the PSAP is not supposed to use the field when/if making a callback, > I think we shall explicitly state that in the document, and/or in > general say that the field must not be used for calls that are expected > to be given priority/special handling, and give callback as an example. > > Regards, > > Christer > > > > Sent from */Windows/* using *TouchDown*(www.nitrodesk.com > <http://www.nitrodesk.com>) > > > -----Original Message----- > *From:* Brian Rosen [br@brianrosen.net] > *To:* Christer Holmberg [christer.holmberg@ericsson.com] > *CC:* ecrit_ietf.org [ecrit@ietf.org] > *Subject:* Re: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: Question on > scope of the Contact URI, defined in section 3.1.5 > > The Contact is how the PSAP contacts the service provider to get help > from the SP. > > It's not a "call back" in the sense of an emergency call (the network > doesn't treat it differently than a normal call), at least as far as I > have considered it. I suppose it might be nice to know that it's > important, but I don't think that is worth any big new mechanism. > > Brian > > > > On Thursday, August 8, 2013, Christer Holmberg wrote: > > I haven't seen any reply to this. Brian, do you have any opinion? > > Regards, > > Christer > > > > Sent from */Windows/* using *TouchDown* (www.nitrodesk.com > <http://www.nitrodesk.com>) > > > -----Original Message----- > *From:* Christer Holmberg [christer.holmberg@ericsson.com] > *To:* ecrit@ietf.org [ecrit@ietf.org] > *Subject:* [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: Question on > scope of the Contact URI, defined in section 3.1.5 > > Hi, > > A question on the scope of the Contact URI, defined in section 3.1.5 of > draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11.txt. > > Is the Contact URI supposed by the PSAP when making callbacks? > > If the value represents a “service provider”, should PSAP callbacks also > be made to the service provider? > > Regards, > > Christer > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message may be > privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, > or responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, > any review, forwarding, dissemination, distribution or copying of this > communication or any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately, > and delete it and all attachments from your computer and network. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ecrit mailing list > Ecrit@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit >
- [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: Ques… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: … Brian Rosen
- Re: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: … Brian Rosen
- Re: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: … Roger Marshall
- Re: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: … Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: … Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: … DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: … Christer Holmberg