Re: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: Question on scope of the Contact URI, defined in section 3.1.5

[Brian Rosen <[e-mail]>]

The Contact is how the PSAP contacts the service provider to get help from
the SP.

It's not a "call back" in the sense of an emergency call (the network
doesn't treat it differently than a normal call), at least as far as I have
considered it.  I suppose it might be nice to know that it's important, but
I don't think that is worth any big new mechanism.

Brian


On Thursday, August 8, 2013, Christer Holmberg wrote:

>  I haven't seen any reply to this. Brian, do you have any opinion?
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
>
> Sent from *Windows* using *TouchDown* (www.nitrodesk.com)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* Christer Holmberg [[e-mail]<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[e-mail]');>
> ]
> *To:* [e-mail] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[e-mail]');> [
> [e-mail] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[e-mail]');>]
> *Subject:* [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: Question on scope
> of the Contact URI, defined in section 3.1.5
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> A question on the scope of the Contact URI, defined in section 3.1.5 of
> draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11.txt.
>
>
>
> Is the Contact URI supposed by the PSAP when making callbacks?
>
>
>
> If the value represents a “service provider”, should PSAP callbacks also
> be made to the service provider?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Christer
>
>
>