Re: [Ecrit] HUM on PhoneBCP

[<[e-mail]>]

 This is correct. 
Thank you, Hannes. 


-----Original Message-----
From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 2:45 PM
To: [e-mail]; Liess, Laura
Cc: [e-mail]; Jesske, Roland; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: [Ecrit] HUM on PhoneBCP

Ray, 
 
Laura wants to use the reverse DNS lookup by the proxy rather than the
end
host. 
draft-thomson-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery talks about the end host
usage
instead. 
 
Ciao
Hannes
 
 

________________________________

	From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
Behalf Of [e-mail]
	Sent: 07 August, 2009 15:18
	To: [e-mail]
	Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail];
[e-mail]; [e-mail]
	Subject: Re: [Ecrit] HUM on PhoneBCP
	
	
	> Maybe the EC could work like this : 
	> The proxy discovers the LIS based on EDs IP-address using
reverse-
	> DNS and SRV record (this is possible with "identity
extenssions") 
	
	Laura, 
	
	Please see draft-thomson-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-02 
	
	The main LIS Discovery draft from Geopriv previously did almost
exactly what you've just described, but it was changed because of
complaints
from the DNS folk (myself included) that it assumed a mapping between
domain
names and network access that simply often doesn't exist. 
	
	The current proposal instead simply stores the LIS Discovery
U-NAPTR
records directly in the reverse DNS tree, where there's a much stronger
(almost 100%) mapping between the DNS and the network access provider. 
	
	kind regards, 
	
	Ray 
	
	-- 
	Ray Bellis, MA(Oxon) MIET
	Senior Researcher in Advanced Projects, Nominet
	e: [e-mail], t: [phone]