IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [edu-team] Guides program website for IETF 104

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 05 March 2019 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: edu-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: edu-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F7E131150 for <edu-team@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 08:27:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fv8Zb4ZbfOkL for <edu-team@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 08:27:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE32C13105F for <edu-team@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 08:27:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.39.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x25GQvtY012816 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Mar 2019 10:26:58 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1551803219; bh=hGT4l5tzwYv+leJtXR7BC4t5hHZrD8gePhSvwHECtsc=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=HWE2eNrXmPrnTG5r9YhSgo7GN7Y3ltQmgEdmdWZGBRL9C0cq2crl7WmHZgTWs3clU mJR+qSOvPTmmasIo9U9AaXmiUpACnY+ExtFdhs9PrOTMWw8a4TSr+Z/dcMRyAhWQXA KkyM8B78ZY5BCE4m1TELYxoFXoErVVqDwHHePIDo=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.39.7] claimed to be unescapeable.local
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
Cc: "edu-team@ietf.org" <edu-team@ietf.org>
References: <7b8d6808-fcb6-2d3f-d74d-fe4e02febec0@nostrum.com> <1F688327-6B99-4228-8C9D-048F22848C21@isoc.org> <yblsgw1nb4b.fsf@wu.hardakers.net> <a37f1c49-e447-c11c-e4ca-5825d1b3ddc1@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <edeeb207-314a-9af8-31fb-370f4ffc22cc@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 10:26:57 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a37f1c49-e447-c11c-e4ca-5825d1b3ddc1@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/edu-team/ZjSodz27AcTrMtVDZ4yA7qxYOJM>
Subject: Re: [edu-team] Guides program website for IETF 104
X-BeenThere: edu-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Education Team <edu-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/edu-team>, <mailto:edu-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/edu-team/>
List-Post: <mailto:edu-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edu-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-team>, <mailto:edu-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 16:27:08 -0000

Mail has been reconfigured to be sent through said box with an 
established reputation.

RjS

On 3/5/19 9:24 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:
> It is currently sending through a box that hasn't had it's mail 
> reputation cleaned.
>
> I will shift it to send through a local one that has many years of 
> (good) reputation. If that is somehow still problematic, I'll talk to 
> glen about relaying through the primary ietf server.
>
> RjS
>
> On 3/4/19 11:28 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
>> Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org> writes:
>>
>>> I used a second email address to volunteer to be a guide, but I
>>> haven’t yet gotten a link yet via email to finish the “volunteering”…
>>> I did it twice to make sure I wasn’t mistaken…
>> Hmm...  the bounce message seems to indicate that the mail is being
>> denied by microsoft (which I guess is handling isoc's mail). Robert, is
>> this being sent through a brand new SMTP server?  IE, directly from the
>> box?  Maybe we should configure it to transport through the well-known
>> IETF server instead?
>>
>>     ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
>> <odonoghue@isoc.org>
>>      (reason: 550 5.7.606 Access denied, banned sending IP 
>> [138.197.218.117]. To request removal from this list 
>> pl...crosoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=526655 (AS16012609) 
>> [BN3NAM04FT025.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com])
>>
>>     ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>> ... while talking to isoc-org.mail.protection.outlook.com.:
>>>>> DATA
>> <<< 550 5.7.606 Access denied, banned sending IP [138.197.218.117]. 
>> To request removal from this list please visit 
>> https://sender.office.com/ and follow the directions. For more 
>> information please go to 
>> http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=526655 (AS16012609) 
>> [BN3NAM04FT025.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com]
>> 550 5.1.1 <odonoghue@isoc.org>... User unknown
>> <<< 503 5.5.2 Need rcpt command 
>> [BN3NAM04FT025.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com]
>>
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email